Institutions that fail to integrate artificial intelligence into education will suffer losses, and their students will perform worse in exams compared to students from institutions that do integrate AI. Furthermore, when providing guidance for university preferences, it is essential to analyze at least 5–6 years of data using quantitative methods. However, if the educator lacks knowledge in quantitative data analysis, artificial intelligence can be used instead. If AI is also not utilized, the likelihood of students failing to gain admission to a university increases significantly.

Organizations and educators who resist integrating generative AI tools like ChatGPT risk falling behind in relevance, efficiency, and user engagement much like Nokia did when it failed to respond to the smartphone revolution. Just as Nokia underestimated the shift in consumer behavior and lost its market dominance, institutions today risk becoming outdated by clinging to traditional methods while others leverage AI for faster, more personalized experiences. This resistance can lead to competitive disadvantages, reduced innovation, and missed opportunities to enhance learning or productivity through automation and adaptive tools.

Meanwhile, user behavior is rapidly evolving due to tools like ChatGPT. People now prefer conversational AI for tasks they once relied on Google for such as research, writing assistance, and decision making. AI assisted writing, real time feedback, and accessible content creation are reshaping how students learn and professionals work. As expectations shift toward speed, personalization, and interactivity, organizations that fail to adapt risk losing the attention and trust of their users, much like Nokia lost its customer base to more innovative, user focused competitors.

It’s the easiest auto-segmentation tool for vertebrae. If you want cloud-based, Segmed.AI does it with just a DICOM upload.