This is a big question. We ussually discuss about the APCs and the high cost of it, and maybe the importance of Open Access and free publication, but in the other hand hand we think about the time the reviewers invest in our papers and the work hours that the editor and the team spend in the process and it is a trick question in fact... Can we have a good and quality process without paying the review and working with small resources?
I have the experience with TELOS: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales and is not easy, because DOIs have cost, work in social difussion cost and even in Venezuela we have the problem of personal rotation, the university pay for that but is hard to educate each time new people... What do you think about?
I was thinking about a way to make it sustainable in time... In our case, in the country is almost impossible to have access to pay for international services and of course is a disadvantage for the journals in here... We have many teachers and researchers that collaborate in the review because I mean, is the normal way in here... but sometimes you can demand so much about fast reviewing...
What do you think about it? Do you know a way to grow without all the limitations we have? Let me know