The magnitude and direction of the orbiting Earth is a vector. It and a second vector (Earth months later in its orbit) are converted by tensor analysis into the coordinates of a single scalar point. The scalar has magnitude but no direction, and the innumerable spins of particles composing the planet are - in agreement with physics' statement that the scalar is associated with spin zero - reduced to that of a boson possessing spin 0. Like a Bose-Einstein Condensate, such particles have no restriction on the number of them that occupy the same quantum state (their description and predicted behaviour). This lack of restriction is compatible with Earth never having any direction. This state is only possible if it has magnitude occupying a literally infinite and eternal amount of space-time, thus having no need of direction and being capable of possessing the same quantum state as any other body. Occupying all time, vector-1 Earth must be united with vector-2 Earth (the one existing months later in its orbit).

The scalar is without boundaries because it’s associated with spin 0, thence with the Higgs boson (the only confirmed particle with zero spin), and thence with the infinite Higgs field. So the scalar point identified with other bodies in space-time (including living bodies and minds) is actually part of the scalar field or Higgs field, with consciousness being boundaryless instead of being limited to one tiny part of space-time (the brain). In his 1944 science book written for the lay reader ("What Is Life?"), physicist Erwin Schrödinger reconciled this article’s idea of co-existing scalar point and scalar field by a) believing that consciousness is highly dependent on the body (this is then a point manifestation), and b) being sympathetic to the Hindu concept of Brahman, by which each individual's consciousness is only a manifestation of a unitary consciousness pervading the universe (consciousness is then a field manifestation).

More Rodney Bartlett's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions