The Lorentz transformation was proposed by Lorentz to explain Michelson Morley's experiment. Later, Einstein used it only in relativity. The Michaelson Morley experiment only proved that the light path in different directions does not change, not the speed of light in different directions. Invariable, the experimental conclusion is actually two possibilities. One is that other inertial systems produce Lorentzian contraction relative to the ether system, and the other possibility is that the speed of light does not change, and the reasoning based on the two can actually be There is a certain degree of similarity. If an absolute stationary system such as the etheric system is introduced, then we can get the following inferences similar to the relativistic conclusions.

Premise: 1 The interaction between particles is achieved through the exchange of media between particles.

2 Theorem of momentum applies to the movement of microscopic particles

Derivation 1: Because the transmission of energy is not a continuous but a copy of the transmission, so the transmission of force is not continuous but a one-time transfer, each passing a power will deliver a force corresponding to the size of the energy. Assume that the particles exchange interactions with each other once the media interacts with each other. When the particles move close to the speed of light, the relative relativity according to the time interval ∆t= (∆t’)/√(1-〖（□(v/c)）〗^2 ) The time interval for each exchange of mediators increases, the number of interaction forces generated between particles decreases, and the total interaction time for interaction forces per unit time decreases.

According to the momentum theorem: F*t↓=I↓=∆p↓=mv’↓-mv=m∆v↓

The unit time v’↓-v=∆v↓, this can be seen when the force is constant, when the mass is constant, when the particle velocity approaches the speed of light, the average acceleration of the particle per unit time becomes smaller; when the velocity of the object approaches At the speed of light, the average acceleration of the particles inside the object becomes smaller and the movement rate becomes smaller. The time required to complete an activity or an internal change increases, and the object becomes slower for a stationary observer.

Derivation 2: The force generated by the radiation field on the particles moving in the radiation direction (collided with the photon). The higher the particle velocity, the smaller the force generated by the collision, the smaller the generated acceleration, and the acceleration when the particle velocity approaches the speed of light. Approaching zero, because the particle as a reference system, the greater the particle velocity, due to the Doppler effect, the lower the frequency of radiation, the smaller the photon momentum, the smaller the impulse generated by the collision with the particle, and the motor vehicle The same is true for（ p=F↓V↑ ）therefore, the reason why the speed of an object is limited in the process of accelerating an object using light pressure is that the light pressure is reduced rather than increased.

Conclusion: According to ∆t= (∆t’)/√(1-〖（□(v/c)）〗^2 ), ∆t↓ → F*t↓=I↓; according to Doppler effect, v↑ →p↓ →I↓

Therefore, can be obtained. I=I。√(1-〖（□(v/c)）〗^2 ) (where I is the impulse generated by the external force or internal interaction force when the object is at rest)

When I↓=m∆v↓, the magnitude of the force is constant and the mass is constant, the greater the speed, the smaller the speed change.

So at When I=I。√(1-（□(v/c)）^2 ) holds, F=ma and v=□((v’+v)/(1+(v’+v)/c^2 )) Not contradictory

Therefore, m= m。/√(1-〖（□(v/c)）〗^2 ) Whether it's right or wrong is questionable; the faster the particle speed in a circular motion in a cyclotron

According to I=I。√(1-（□(v/c)）^2 ), I↓→an↓, an↓= (v^2)/(r↑)=r↑=〖（2π/(T↑)）〗^2, consistent with experimental facts;

I=I。√(1-（□(v/c)）^2 )) and m= m。/√(1-〖（□(v/c)）〗^2 ) The same effect.

If the Lorentz transformation is only the transformation of other inertial systems with respect to the ether system, then a similar relativistic effect between the two inertial systems can be deduced but asymmetrical.

And to verify the above inferences, we need to achieve synchronization of the clock

An atomic clock emits a nano-bullet that moves at a given speed through a vacuum pipe to another atomic clock at a given moment. The other atomic clock records the instant at which the bullet reaches and calculates the time of another atomic clock based on the known speed and distance. Sync the clock and repeat the back and forth comparisons. The data match shows that the clock time coincides.