Yes, the blade-rotor configuration you're describing—where the axis of rotation of the engine is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft—can indeed be used to propel aircraft. This configuration is similar to ducted fans or propfans and has been explored in both traditional and experimental aircraft designs.
Benefits:
Efficient Thrust Generation:Large diameter rotors, like those in turbochargers, can operate efficiently at lower tip speeds, which reduces compressibility losses and noise. They can potentially deliver higher thrust-to-power ratios compared to jet engines, especially at lower speeds.
Fuel Efficiency:The configuration allows for propfan-like operation, where counter-rotating blades improve fuel efficiency over turbofans, particularly for subsonic and transonic flights.
Compact Design:Using twin-entry turbocharger principles could result in smaller and lighter engines that still provide significant thrust, useful for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or light aircraft.
High Maneuverability:This setup could facilitate vectored thrust designs, providing better control authority for vertical/short take-off and landing (V/STOL) aircraft.
Reduced Drag:The ability to integrate such systems within the fuselage or wing structure could reduce external drag compared to traditional exposed propellers or engines.
Best Fit for Aircraft Types or Missions:
Urban Air Mobility (UAM):Suitable for eVTOL (Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing) aircraft, where distributed propulsion and compact rotors are crucial. Examples: Urban air taxis, personal aerial vehicles.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs):Ideal for drones requiring high endurance and low noise profiles for reconnaissance and surveillance missions.
Hybrid-Electric Aircraft:Could be used in hybrid propulsion systems where fuel efficiency and low emissions are prioritized, enabling regional airliners and cargo transport.
Tiltrotor or Tiltwing Aircraft:Rotors could be used in VTOL-to-forward-flight transition designs, combining the vertical lift of helicopters with the forward efficiency of fixed-wing aircraft (e.g., Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey).
High-Altitude, Long-Endurance (HALE) Aircraft:Suitable for solar-powered UAVs or high-efficiency atmospheric satellites requiring extended endurance at low power consumption.
STOL or VTOL Rescue Aircraft:Beneficial for missions requiring operations from confined spaces like disaster zones or ship decks.
Challenges to Consider:
Structural Complexity:Mounting such a system perpendicular to the aircraft axis requires reinforced bearings and gear mechanisms for torque transfer.
Weight Constraints:The need for heavy-duty structures to handle rotational forces may increase overall weight, impacting efficiency.
Aerodynamic Losses:Additional ducting or structural supports might induce drag if not carefully designed.
Noise Control:Although quieter than traditional propellers, optimizing noise levels for cabin comfort and regulations might require acoustic tuning.
This approach could significantly advance hybrid-electric and distributed propulsion systems, particularly for next-generation sustainable aviation and UAV technologies.
I suppose from your picture that the propeller axis is also perpendicular to the longitudinal airplane axis.
If so, this type of propeller, like vertical axis wind turbines, or boat paddle wheels, and other similar devices, that use blade drag forces instead of blade lift forces to provide thrust, may be useful only for very small Reynolds number devices (very small sizes, very low speeds, or highly viscous flows) when drag forces are larger and more easily obtainable than lift forces, for instance, for insect wings, and may be for small drones.