In the sense that it depends on describing reality and its criticism, and perhaps applying the solution through the inductive method, even if that contradicts the theories that support the idea
It is important -
1. To be clear about your research question (what do I want to know about?)
2. To be thoroughly family with
a. What others have said about that question and/or related questions; and
b. What others have discovered about your question or related questions via empirical research
3. To design a process that will provide some answers to your research question
4. And then to carry out your research
This is by way of saying that you need to do the hard wok described in the above 4 steps before you can reach any conclusion by applying either inductive or deductive reasoning.
Thank you for clarifying these important points .. I have dealt with these four steps well..The idea is that in the event of limited data in the studied reality, I relied on a sample to access real data..The idea in the inductive approach is experimentation, is it possible to apply the experiment to the study community?
Greetings to you
There are standards concerning the inferential process that are well laid out in Cresswell.
https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book255675
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking