Contributions to the History of Ontological Thinking in Economics with a specific focus on 'Process and Order'
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277328137_Contributions_to_the_History_of_Ontological_Thinking_in_Economics_with_a_specific_focus_on_'Process_and_Order
Tony Lawson is afraid that I will criticize his ontology (I will) as I did in my Critique of Tony Lawson on Neoclassical Economics, where I pointed out that ontology is just dialectical materialism without mention of Marx. I also pointed out that his term “processual” is just historical materialism in disguise.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280948689_Critique_of_Tony_Lawson_on_Neoclassical_Economics
It annoys me that the Marxists are attempting to confuse the language by redefining words. A whole generation of English students is being taught Marxism in college while their parents believe that they are learning ontology, a word they have never heard before. The parents know very well that Marx was thoroughly refuted over a century ago and has been rejected in communist countries like China that are still called Marxist. Chinese students have told me that they openly read newspapers or play chess in their Marxism class – a huge breach of etiquette in any other class – because neither they nor their teacher believes a word of it. They are amazed and appalled to see gullible English students being taught this same material under the name of ontology, wholly unaware that they are learning Marxism.
It also annoys me that Lawson and his comrades at the World Economics Association call themselves pluralists while conspiring to prevent me from obtaining this document so that I can criticize it. But if someone else requests the full text, Lawson will send it to them and then they can pass it on to me.
Article Contributions to the History of Ontological Thinking in Econ...
Research Critique of Tony Lawson on Neoclassical Economics
Hi Victor,
Since the material you requested is published, it is available in the databases without the necessity to request it from the author. I have attached them herewith.
Well, it is unending debate. but I believe that both of you are true scholars and have open hearts for accepting criticism the fruitful feedback of knowledge from each other, let us enjoy your revelations with open hearts and minds !
Regards
Thanks, but neither of those pdf files are the one I requested. The first is something Lawson published in 2014, though everything he writes is very similar so it may work.
The second is an introduction to something, possibly the requested paper, but it is an excerpt of only a few pages and does not say what it is introducing.
The title :"Contributions to the History of Ontological Thinking in Economics with a specific focus on 'Process and Order"" is the title of the special issue of Cambridge Journal of Economics, Volume 39 Issue 4 July 2015, and can be found here:
http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/4.toc
The issue consists of 9 articles written by various authors in addition to an introduction. Do you mean you want all articles of the special issue ? I can provide them for you if you want.
Kind regards,
Thank you.
Do you know if there are any economics departments today that oppose the World Economics Association? In 1930 the London School of Economics, led by Friedrich Hayek opposed Cambridge, but as far as I can tell, today they and every other economics department in the world march in lockstep with the World Economics Association.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Economics