It is a rotifer belonging to Polyarthra; the species can not be identified on photomicrographs because detailed analysis of the external morphology (fins, position of antennae, etc) and the trophi are imperative.
I agree with Willem H. De Smet, but can I have a question? What kind of the freshwater habitat you found it? What about pH? Is it a dam, lake or fishpond?
Koste W. (1978): Rotatoria, Die Rädertiere Mitteleuropas, Ein Bestimmungswerk, begründet von Max Voigt, Überordnung Monogononta. – Gebrüder Borntraeger,
At first you should check the external morphology: body length; fins: how long they are, their shape, present or not the ventral fins (for example in the picture you can see shorter ventral fins: http://rotifera.hausdernatur.at/Rotifer_data/images/addscan/_full-size/Polyarthra%20dolichoptera%20Idelson,%201925%20[Bartos,%201951].jpg
etc.
And finally you can dissolve it by solution of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO). Maybe you could know it like a SAVO for cleaning and disinfection. The rotifer throphi remain and you can check it. The rotifer throphi website for example: http://www.rotifera.hausdernatur.at/Rotifer_data/trophi/
Nogrady, T. & Segers, H. (eds.) 2002. Rotifera vol. 6. Asplanchnidae, Gastropodidae, Lindiidae, Microcodidae, Synchaetidae, Trochosphaeridae and Filinia. In: Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, vol. 18. Dumont H. J. (ed.), Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 1–264.
It is in general not possible to safely identify Polyarthra from a single photograph, it would need different views and ideally also information on the trophi. In this particular case however P. remata is likely. This small species is characteristic by a trilobed posterior body end and only 4 vitellary nuclei (the latter is not entirely clear from your photo, please check). Size should be less than 100 µm and no ventral appendages should be present.