salaam

antinatalist trends in academia have strongly influenced work place education in a disruptive manor creating barriers/impediments to productivity and quality of life for workers significantly impeding effective workplace communication. the reduction of perceived value of blue collar workers is strongly influenced by the onset of feminist thought on the subject of access to high paying construction jobs in the west. pathways to access for these jobs were made, however women did not respond in large numbers to take advantage of these difficult dirty and often highly technical jobs. women's studies classes started to become a reality in academia in the late 60's . men's studies was formed largely in response to, and as a critique of, an emerging men's rights movement, and as such, has been taught in academic settings only since the 1970s (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_studies) however these courses tended strongly to focus on male homosexuality and perceptions of male privilege. these stressors  contribute to disruption of Managerial workplace learning, linked to workplace learning environment'.

for the year 2003, the suicide rates in Australia were 17.7 per 100,000 for males, 4.7 per 100,000 for females, and 11.1 per 100,000 for the general population.

matesinconstruction.org.au/wp-content/uploads/.../2006-MIC_AISRAP-Report.pdf

http://kcts9.org/sites/default/files/unit5_readings_womenandworkafterwwii.pdf

http://sites.uci.edu/pjshah/files/2013/09/Kimmel_A-War-Against-Boys.pdf

https://www.pomsmeetings.org/confpapers/043/043-1565.pdf

You can also consider the issue of workplace diversity. I have done some research on the student diversity in higher education that can inform the latter, which I hope can be helpful for you.

Best regards,

Debra

Article Workforce Education and Development (WED): Graduate Students...

Data Generation I: International and invisible in a workforce edu...

Data Curriculum Inclusiveness Challenge: Responding to Multicultu...

salaam

Debra Sharon Ferdinand's article sites Critical race theory, below is an excerpt of the Wikipedia article on the subject. "First, CRT proposes that white supremacy and racial power are maintained over time, and in particular, that the law may play a role in this process." when generalizations are used in regards to race, one should be concerned that racism is being promoted. saying that some one is racist because of there race is a fallacy. Critical race theory should be examined in a critical context to determine if a bias against people with low pigmentation  exists.

A fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning, or "wrong moves"[1] in the construction of an argument.[2][3] A fallacious argument may be deceptive by appearing to be better than it really is. Some fallacies are committed intentionally to manipulate or persuade by deception, while others are committed unintentionally due to carelessness or ignorance. Lawyers acknowledge that the extent to which an argument is sound or unsound depends on the context in which the argument is made.[4]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

Workforce Education and Development (WED): Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Cultural Insensitivity in Classroom Teaching – A Mixed Methods Study (C'bean Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 27-43)

Can anyone suggest literature support for 'Managerial workplace learning, linked to workplace learning environment'? - ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_anyone_suggest_literature_support_for_Managerial_workplace_learning_linked_to_workplace_learning_environment [accessed Aug 1, 2016].

Critical race theory (CRT)[1] is a theoretical framework in the social sciences focused upon the application of critical theory,[2][3] a critical examination of society and culture, to the intersection of race, law, and power.[2][3]

It began as a theoretical movement within US law schools in the mid- to late 1980s as a reaction to critical legal studies[4] and is loosely unified by two common themes. First, CRT proposes that white supremacy and racial power are maintained over time, and in particular, that the law may play a role in this process. Second, CRT work has investigated the possibility of transforming the relationship between law and racial power, and more broadly, pursues a project of achieving racial emancipation and anti-subordination.[5] Scholars such as Derrick Bell applauded the focus of civil rights scholarship on race, but were deeply critical of civil rights scholars' commitment to colorblindness and their focus on intentional discrimination, rather than a broader focus on the conditions of racial inequality.[6][7] Likewise, scholars like Patricia Williams, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Mari Matsuda embraced the focus on the reproduction of hierarchy in critical legal studies, but criticized CLS scholars for failing to focus on racial domination and on the particular sources of racial oppression.[8]

By 2002, over 20 US law schools and at least 3 foreign law schools offered critical race theory courses or classes which covered the issue centrally.[9] Critical race theory is taught and innovated in the fields of education, political science, women's studies, ethnic studies, and American studies.[10]:6–7

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory