I surface modified a porous material, but I want to make sure that I modified both surface of the material as well as the pores of the material? I need a method or an analysis to determine if the modification occurred in the pores of the material.
Make the same modification on non-porous surface and analyse both porous and non-porous surfaces with XPS. It is better if you have BET results, also. You will know the surface area of the porous surface. I fyou would have significantly more signal of functional group with XPS, you can conclude that you have modified even in the porous.
you can also make SEM-EDX analysis, which would be a second proof.
I think it will be useful to measure a complete Nitrogen absorpion/desorption from which you can evaluate the pore size distribution. Compare this before and after surface modification.
I agree with C. Alvani. Measuring a complete nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm and analysing the evolution of the textural parameters after the functionalization procedures you will be able to notice whether the grafting of the organic molecules occurred in the pores or at the surface. The functionalization is accompanied by a decrease in the pore size diameter and in the total pores volume, If you observe only a decrease of the SBET value , the functionalization is mainly at the surface of the material. .
Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS) may help if the pores are under 30 nm in diameter and you are interested in pore size change. With Coincidence Doppler Broadening Spectrometry (CDBS) one may try to see if the pore surface is unchanged compared to the bulk material, however, it is a little bit tricky to resolve the contributions from the pore surface and the bulk and has to be tested.
Depending on the pore size you could also try confocal microscopy. By tagging your functional groups with a dye you can take sectional images and see if you have fluorescence all over the sample.