Can anyone provide me the line spectrum of several atoms? We have created the electrical models of different atoms like Hydrogen, sodium and Iron. We are interested to validate our approach for different atoms.
For which part of the electromagnetic spectrum were the line spectra required?
Also would an emission or an absorption spectrum best meet the requirements?
I hope the moderator doesn't chastize me for answering a question with questions, but I thought it was important to clarify the above issues. From my readings in Quantum Physics, experimental physicists have obtained spectra for chemical elements under different electromagnetic wavelengths and either absorption or emission, depending on whether the element was in an energetic gaseous state, or if the electromagnetic energy passed through the element under investigation.
The paper is well written, and provides (to me at least) an innovative, inspiring and unique method to study the Quantum Mechanics behavior of atoms using Capacitance measurements.
I would like to humbly submit the following personal observations, for consideration:
I also notice that the theory is strongly oriented towards the use of the Bohr model of the atom, and does not include Schrödinger's wave model? Near the end of page 2, the symbol Ψ is included, for the Schrödinger wave function, and if I'm not mistaken, on page 3 in Figure 2, the wave model image is shown on the left hand side, without the wave function included in the paper, or is the image on the left a probabilistic electron particle density diagram, I'm confused because the Figure 2 description includes Ψ, the symbol usually denoting Schrödinger's wave function?
On page 3, the word radiuses is used in the Figure 2 description and in the sentence below Equation (3); I was taught the correct plural for radius is radii?
The quote on page 6 "The capacitance property of graphene is tunable
by voltage drop" than "the electronic band gap is tunable by applied electric field"; there is no reference as to who wrote or said these remarks?
I'm don't feel sufficiently qualified in Quantum Physics to comment further.
If this hasn't already been done, I'd suggest submitting the paper to a peer reviewed scientific journal such as Nature magazine. Scientific papers are reviewed by peers from other Universities or Research Institutes qualified in the appropriate field of study:
http://www.nature.com/index.html
Near the upper right hand corner there is a link: Submit Manuscript
Another web site appears, with a list of journals, including Nature, to which a manuscript may be submitted to for peer review by qualified referees.
I clicked on the Nature Physics link that sent me to the following web page:
http://mts-nphys.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex
Past Physicists who had some of their work published in Nature magazine included Albert Einstein, James Chadwick and Otto R. Frisch.
In closing, I wanted to say that I enjoyed reading the paper's inventive approach to studying the Quantum Physics phenomenon, makes for an intellectually refreshing change.