Each have their positives and negatives with probability sampling preferred in scholarly research when possible. Here are some articles that you might find helpful:

http://jah.sagepub.com/content/18/4/565.short

http://search.proquest.com/openview/8f5b4db1aaef4935145dd5f441bf5142/1?pq-origsite=gscholar

http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/10/05/poq.nfr020.short

http://www.anatomyfacts.com/research/researchmethodsknowledgebase.pdf

https://jssam.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/2/90.full

The usual way is to buy good books about the area. I suggest to read this link:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Which_are_the_most_complete_books_on_Practical_Sampling_Theory_in_English_Spanish_French_and_other_languages

Mohamed -

You might find this to be of interest:

Ken Brewer's Waksberg Award article: 

 Brewer, K.R.W. (2014), “Three controversies in the history of survey sampling,” Survey Methodology,

(December 2013/January 2014), Vol 39, No 2, pp. 249-262. Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 12-001-X.

http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2013002/article/11883-eng.htm

Note that the model-based example he gave, equation (4.3), is for the classical ratio estimator. 

Cheers - Jim