I consider that isn't the right decision. First, the UK will be obligated to negotiate single treaties in every subject (Commerce, migration, etc) with all of the countries inside the EU and with all of the countries which has any treaty with the EU. Second, when they negotiate those treaties with the EU, they will be obligated to accept EU standards if they want to do any commerce with any EU country. Lastly, there is a big social division inside the UK, which can result from individual conflicts and racism, to a very big social division just like the Scottish Referendum.
I don't think Brexit was a good choice, especially because it can increase racism and discrimination. Moreover, even the quantity of votes to decide for going out wasn't too big compared to the whole population...There are many other issues related to Brexit. For more studies about it, I recommend some papers available at ICON website, which you can find at the following link: http://www.iconnectblog.com/?s=Brexit
British voters were wise to vote for "Brexit" over "Remain."
European Union regulations had grown too burdensome and were interfering with too many aspects of everyday life. Now Parliament, the United Kingdom's own democratically accountable legislature, will have full authority in many areas where it makes sense to decide things on a national level.
That said, it is important not to exaggerate the difference between "Brexit" and "Remain." Europe and the UK will continue to enjoy a close, special relationship, working together to combat threats to security and to ensure free trade continues.
Where the modern world going to be a global village, there BREXIT against the Globalization. I think it's a symbolic separation from Mankind by the British people.
At this moment we can´t really share more than personal opinions. Political positions, economical theories, historical analyses and even personal beliefs may support what one may think future will bring. In perhaps two years we shall have a few ideas with regard to the terms of the agreement between UE and GB. Later both parties will restart their relationship on the basis of that agreement and, as often happens, real politics go beyond what was foreseen even by the most attentive observers and influential commentators.
At the same time, GB's society by itself will naturally change, EU and GB will not stay alone in the world, but will most certainly continue together in geographical Europe and continue to pursue common interests in many parts of the world. Different threats and opportunities will arise in an every changing world and most certainly the positions of observers and commentators will change from time to time.
As I heard a few weeks ago, come back in one hundred years and ask it to me again.
I think this is a right decision from the younger generation point of view. They think GB's continuation with EU will affect them badly from economic, social, cultural and employment point of view. They bothered by security and employability.
I had a discussion with three senior citizens of Uk. They feel it is a wrong decision. According to them this decision will negatively affect mobility, economic development and the status of UK in the world. Basically they are emotional rather than rational like present young generation.
Only time will decide what is right and what is wrong?
I think the decision to exit is right mostly in the area of movement of people. The migration was only in one direction; and very few people going eastward with the result that British cities were over run by foreigners who won't integrate. British culture was disappearing. The country became an easy target for terrorists disguised as assylum seekers . Britain will survive the exit.
Young generation feels it the right decision. They are rational. Elderly citizen feels it is a wrong decision because they are emotional. Only time and situation will tell is it right or wrong decision. Let us wait and watch.
The decision is mostly influenced by psycho-mental determinants and not by future standards of economic welfare. The benevolent intentions of the EU foundation documents can now be easily manipulated into a malvolent technocracy, e.g. wrong ECB policy. This deep psychological distrust reinforced the British tradition of democratic governance at the cost of 'economic rationality'. The study of history shows us that the standard of economic welfare alone is no guarantee against revolution, war and social desaster.
Here you can follow two threads started by two British scientists and with over 100 followers. The discussion contains not only opinions of all over the world but shows particular British statistics on Brexit and tries to analyse the reasons and consequences of this event.
As a citizen of EU and so being perhaps partial, I think Brexit was an unfortunate incident from point of view of common European interests and the desirable cooperation of progression. UK statistics showed (and you can find the resources in the former mentioned threads) that mostly insular, less cultivated and older UK citizens voted for Brexit.
No, the decision by Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) to leave the European Union was not correct, because most of the decision was taken by older adults who are no longer working and who live from their memories (and some of their pensions) of what was (past), and not of what may be (future) Great Britain; canceling or hindering the development possibilities of the new generations.
On the other hand, I remember that this movement was driven mainly by politicians of England, without taking into account the politicians of the other two countries.
regards
Jose Luis
Estimado Iqbal Thonse Hawaldar
No, la decisión de Gran Bretaña (Inglaterra, Escocia y País de Gales) de salir del ámbito de la Unión Europea no fue la correcta, debido a que tomaron dicha decisión en su mayoría, adultos de la tercer edad que no están ya trabajando y que viven de sus recuerdos (y algunos de sus pensiones) de lo que fue (pasado), y no de lo que puede ser (futuro) la Gran Bretaña; cancelando u obstaculizando las posibilidades de desarrollo de las nuevas generaciones.
Por otro lado, recuerdo que este movimiento fue impulsado principalmente por políticos de Inglaterra, sin tomar en cuenta a los políticos de los otros dos países.
“I will do everything I can as prime minister to steady the ship over the coming weeks and months,” Mr. Cameron said. “But I do not think it would be right for me to try to be the captain that steers our country to its next destination.” The statement reveals that existing from EU is not right decision.
I think Europe is past its best days. EU at one time may have made sense, but today, each country needs to weigh its own interests and the decide. it is too early to give a conclusive answer.
Are the motives for Britain to joining the European Union now dead?
If the answer is (yes), then Britain is a country with a strong economy and strong domestic and foreign policy which can compensate for its exit from the European Union through strategic alliances in the economic, political and military spheres with countries of a similar economic, political and military nature.
It's very interesting that the majority of British voters think that the decision to leave the European Union (EU) was a mistake for the first time since the referendum, according to a YouGov survey for The Times.
Forty-five percent of 1,590 respondents said that in hindsight, the country was wrong to vote for Brexit, 43 percent stand by the decision to withdraw from the bloc and 12 percent said they didn’t know.
I sure only about that: Brexit is a decision contrary to the global trend. EU is an example for the world, many countries, many cultures (with tensions of centurys) find the way of integration. In America, where in theory is easier it has not been possible, although it is attempted.
I do not think so, three countries (Germany, France and Britain) represent the building blocks of Europe, when the imbalance in one of the pillars will hurt everyone, this does not happen now, but will happen in the long term.
If Brixit proceeds to conclusion the country will surely regret that fateful day the pro-Brixit narrowly won the referendum. Britain has reformed a great deal as a member of the EU and still needs more reforms. It also gained a lot in many ways that cannot be in dispute. Brixit will end or at least slow down needed reforms and many benefits will be lost.