I am studying polyethylene heat absorbing systems. For example, modeling heat exchanges in a solar air heater and temperatures for melting polyethylene.
A simple way is to calculate the equilibrium temperatures at steady state. the solar radiation is partly reflected and absorbed by the plastic sheet, of which reflexion and absorption coefficients should be known, and partly reflected and absorbed by the absorber. This provide the heat flow rate (in W/m²) for both. On the other way, both loose heat. the plastic sheet loses heat to the surrounding air, depending on its temperature and on the wind velocity. Usually, a heat transfer coefficient is either calculated or an average value is assumed (e.g. at 25 W/m²K). This heat loss is proportional to the heat loss coefficient multiplied by the temperature difference between the sheet (unknown) and the air (assumed known)
The absorber provides heat to the user and loose heat to the surrounding environment. The calculation of the latter is similar to that for the plastic sheet, but for its both surfaces: heat loss towards the plastic sheet, and heat loss on its backside. The provided heat is the product of the fluid flow rate by the inlet-outlet temperature difference, multiplied by the specific heat of the fluid used to transport the heat. to the user. Equating the l heat losses of each sheet to the absorbed solar intensity provides two equations , from which the temperatures can be obtained.
The problem as defined is a simple conduction problem: if the heat flux is prescribed then the temperature field depends on the conductivities of the materials and probably the method of build. The sink temperature is the melting point of polyethylene. The full solution, as described by C-A.R above is much more complex. If it is needed, reflection is significant at low angles of incidence: it seems to me that a simple constant heat flux based approach is appropriate.
It is useful to have several ways of viewing this problem. Your approach gives me new ideas. I need to do some calculations to determine what model is the best fit. Regards,
Thank You Suresh, I will review this paper. It looks interesting. Do you know of anyone working with Fresnel lens systems? They give you a higher Incident Solar Flux but tracking has to be done carefully.