If you stick with the terms listed, it seems that your results will be similar to past studies. Using phenomen-based terms could put you on track to adding to new knowledge. Just be sure to stay away from using phenomenon-based terms used by artists. This has been overplayed in the literature. At this point in history - we need a true descriptive definition of creativity as a person-centered process. Research, for the most part, over the past 50 years has been circular. The field needs to turn old perspectives upside-down. They define outcomes rather than the process. If the process is defined precisely, understanding goes up, engagement in process increases (free of evaluation real or implied), and self-identity with personal creativity increases. As Mark Runco brilliantly observed: All creativity begins with personal creativity. I am happy to help.
Things change, with us or without us. I always am on the lookout to learn new things, methods, and ideas. At one time people believed that the Earth was flat. We know better now.
Gregg:
The link tab on creativity above can provide some more insight into your topic:
https://www.researchgate.net/topic/Creativity?ev=tp_pst_dtl_xkey
Best regards,
Debra
The one who is not open to the feedback will never survive in this fast changing world of science. Logic demands to accept the facts whatever they are and where they are.
Dear Marta Ockuly ,
This link will help you in your project:
http://www.redalyc.org/html/3606/360634165007/
Best of luck,
Litar
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology
- Emotional Psychology
- Happiness