Are you familiar with the rethinking democracy series such as rethinking democracy 101 and link to understanding temporary authoritarianism dynamics WITHIN MAJORITY RULE BASED LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES?
The article below introduces the theory that can be extended to understand what made possible since 2016 for exism movements like Brexit, Usexit, Brazilanexit and so on to come to exist, persist and spread.
Muñoz, Lucio, 2024. Rethinking Democracy 101: How can a general present-absent effective targeted chaos and independent rule of law quadrant-based framework be built to capture the necessary and sufficient conditions for democratic and non-democratic models to come to exist and persist in power once in power?, In: CEBEM-REDESMA Boletin, Año 18, Nº 8, La Paz, Bolivia.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382964418_Rethinking_Democracy_101_How_can_a_general_present-absent_effective_targeted_chaos_and_independent_rule_of_law_quadrant-based_framework_be_built_to_capture_the_necessary_and_sufficient_conditions_for_
Abstract
The 2016 BREXIT/leave EU and the 2016 USEXIT/Trumpism came and went in ways inconsistent with traditional democratic thinking and theory, which has made it difficult for normal democratic actors to understand the behavior of extreme democratic actors. See the coming and going of extreme democratic outcomes is linked to the existence or not of effective targeted chaos. Traditional democratic theory thinkers have been dealing with non-traditional democratic actors as if they were traditional democratic actors as from inside the box of traditional democratic thinking you cannot see that conditions that can lead to extreme democratic outcomes and which can allow them to persist in a world under effective targeted chaos so traditional democratic actors cannot take proactive action, just reactive action under knowledge gaps. Hence, there is a need to rethink democracy thinking and this paper tries to contribute to that by posting and answering the following questions: How can a general presentabsent effective targeted chaos and independent rule of law quadrant-based framework be built to capture the necessary and sufficient conditions for democratic and non-democratic models to come to exist and persist in power once in power? What are the implications of this for democracies and authoritarianism-based models? How can this framework apply to exism movements under temporary authoritarianism like Trumpism?
Yes, I’m familiar with the “Rethinking Democracy” series; it frames democracy as adaptable rather than static and links to temporary authoritarianism by showing how democratic systems can absorb shocks, regressions, or “grey zones” without collapsing entirely, offering insight into how authoritarian tendencies rise and recede within democratic institutions.
THAT AI has not read that article or the series, that is not what the articles are about. I wish AI COULD BE HERE IN THE DISCUSION TO CORRECT IT DIRECTLY
Please, it is okay to use AI to have an idea, but it is your obligation to figure out that what you are given is consistent with the actual ideas in those papers, otherwise you will lose CREDIBILITY
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Higher Education
- Universities