This was a limited data set that I was able to collect some months ago. I got positive feedback when I published the paper, but what does the broader community make of this?
Article What are the Characteristics of a Scholar?
The results of a study are of paramount importance in the related context that the study is done. I think you have tried to broaden the scope of your study by including some data from countries other than the US and Canada (or maybe it is just a matter of convenience) but since your data is mostly from these two countries, your results seem not to be very generalizable in the other countries (DIFFERENT COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT NORMS AND CULTURES e.g. what is good in the US might considered bad in China).
Moreover, generalizability, statistically speaking, is related to the normality of distribution in your data; the more representative your data is, the more generalizable your findings are to your population.
Tabulate your results with respect to different ideas in different countries.