It feels like you are distinguishing between the interpretive themes you develop and the practical advice that you provide on "most useful sources of information", and "most important information topics". I agree that if you treated those two topics as themes they would indeed be "under developed," but that need not be the case if you first develop a set of interpretive themes, and then use those themes to organize and present the more practical information.

In some ways, this might be a distinction between what goes into your Results section (the themes) and what goes into your Discussion section (the practical implications of those themes).

Thanks David L Morgan that all makes sense, thanks for your response

Hi,

I noticed the superlative form in your practical advice topics, as David L Morgan called them. I might ask, what kind of processes lead you to emphasize certain topics in your study, to consider them best ones. In other words: where do the criteria for "most useful" and "most important" come from?

Regards,

Juha