In this case the lack of a picture of bones sticking out of a cliff face means there
is no definitive proof as to whether they exist or do not exist. The proof is in the documentation and distribution of materials that proof it exists, proves where it is at,
associates it with some geologic layer, and then documents its X, Y and especially
Z co-ordinates, and provides a map where it can be looked at.
Since you actually work on the coastal areas of South America, are there wave cut
benches, or remnants of wave cut benches above the coastal plateau ?
And ,if they are there, do they maintain a fairly constant elevation for
hundreds of Kilometers along the coast?
They may be buried, so a soil change, and a texture change may be more evident.,
or a sudden change in the slope of the land from shallower to steeper.
If it is a maximum global sea level elevation, the change should extend for
hundreds of kilometers along the coast.
Since whales do not walk on land, all whale skeletons should be found
below that elevation. The only way whale skeletons could be found above
that elevation would be in an area of lateral tectonic compression resulting
in a fairly resent buckling and rupture of the layers resulting in a tectonic
uplift.
Whale skeletons tell you that you had ocean over what is now land.
Topographic changes tell you the maximum elevation of the water