My research field is supercritical water gasification of biomass for hydrogen production.
A good scientific review used to contain a discussion of results and ideas. That assumes a relatively high level of the review's author(s). For the early stage researchers, it is an opportunity to learn a lot about their upcoming scientific field, and a quite significant challenge.
A review is not just a collection of article conclusions and actual data, but it is a critical analysis of them. It is important to start working on it, for example, with a checklist of articles, studied subject matters, methodologies, methods, materials, propertied, results, and ideas.
Then, during the work on the review - to change / correct priorities of listings, subordination of importance, etc. A historical approach as to how this field evolved from its previous roots, what it has become by today, and what it is striving to achieve in the future would be highly desirable.
Any tips how to start writing for a scientific review paper?
You can also consider the following:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282604179_Excel_Template_for_Literature_Review_Catalog
Research Excel Template for Literature Review Catalog
Some simple rules for the good review:
Article Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review
Thanks to all for the aforementioned comments. It is certainly helpful for myself right now, too!
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Writing