H1: There is a significant relationship between the advantages and disadvantages of rail freight services and utilization of rail freight services
H2: There is a significant relationship between haulage operator preference and utilization of rail freight services.
Advantage, disadvantage and haulage operator preference are not my iv.
Utilization of rail freight services is my dv.
Here is my hypothesis. For H1 is using Friedman's ANOVA to get the mean (advantage and disadvantage are using ranked scale which 1=most important, 2=2nd choice, 3=3rd Choice and 5=least important.) and test with one-way ANOVA to know the relationship?
Advantage is having 5 option to rank. Disadvantage also having 5 option to rank.
For H2 is directly using one way ANOVA to test the relationship?
This can only be answered if you tell us something about the measurement model. For example, how are the advantages and disadvantages measured?
Adding to Christian's answer - your hypotheses are 'leading'. It is unconventional to identify degrees of significance before the data. What would be your null hypothesis? Also - against what?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Materials Engineering
- Powders