In principle any non invasive method is preferable to an invasive method, if the two can offer an equivalent result. The problem with wireless endoscopy is that the scope cannot be manipulated by the surgeon, with capsule endoscopy not having the ability to take biopsies is an issue. Having said that, if I were to use a capsule with enhanced imaging quality and quantity which is the advantage of your one (please correct me if I'm wrong - being a doctor I may not have understood your post fully) I would aim for cases were traditional endoscopy is contra-indicated or difficult or (without having any idea about cost-effectiveness) in centres where it is important to have wireless endoscopy for instance in centres where there is high turn over with high H. Pylori incidence and inefficient methods to disinfect the scope between endoscopies. This may be common in hospitals in developing countries. Now for the developed world, patients with comorbidities (significant health problems) who would usually have CT colonography or the ones that previously had incomplete endoscopy can be candidates for capsule endoscopy. The advantage I would focus on would be that capsule endoscopy can be performed in a non specialised centre, while CT colonography needs to happen in a radiology department demonstrated to be have the specific competencies - according to NICE (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg131/chapter/1-Recommendations#investigation-diagnosis-and-staging). These would be the areas that I would target but for a future application in these or other areas you would probably have to work with a clinician for comparative studies assessing how the new capsule is better than ones currently in use or with other methods. Either way, it sounds very promising and increased quality and quantity of images acquired during capsule endoscopy is always a plus. I hope this helps. 

Thank you Marina, every opinion is valuable and inspiring. I just like to add further to my post to clarify that this capsule is tethered, i.e. it will be under the control of surgeon and even will have instrument channel pass through the tether so it will be very fixable through an external magnet controlled robotically by the surgeon. There will be video camera to see as normally for most  endoscope would have but my interest is to explore the radio frequency to generate either hyperthermia or near field heating to "burn the tissue" speaking loosely.  Do you see the clinical needs for such device?  I understand that local increase of temperature could help in certain targeted drug delivery.

 I am open to further discussions and exploring this further directly if that would be interesting for you?

I'm highly interested including collaborating from a clinical point of view - I work in Leeds and my boss is the director of Health Care Technologies in colorectal surgery. I would love to see a video demonstration of the capsule. Would that be possible at all? My email is [email protected]