A solid conservative moves from a liberal to conservative state and then pushes back against what they perceive as extremism in their new community's conservatism. A moderately liberally academic joins a university with a liberal ideology and then is repelled by what they perceive as unsubstantiated dogma. These are some anecdotal observations that strike me as almost an opposite of group polarization. In Social Psychology studies, people in groups whose attitude leans a certain way tend to have members who become more extreme in that leaning, following discussion. After all, they share information that disproportionately supports their side and there’s a natural inclination to be a "good" group member in social comparisons. But sometimes it seems an in-group could repel someone from their pole, rather than driving them towards it. Can you help identify relevant psychological phenomena that may help explain these anecdotes? Do you know of relevant research? ~ Kevin
Note. Question edited a day later to begin with concrete examples.