Studies have shown that both online learning and physical classroom learning can be effective in their own ways, and choosing the right method depends on personal preferences and individual situations.

Online learning offers flexibility and convenience, allowing students to learn at their own pace and on their own schedule. It also provides access to a wider range of programs and courses. However, online learning requires self-discipline and self-motivation, and can be challenging for some students who prefer a more structured or social learning environment.

On the other hand, physical classroom learning offers face-to-face interaction with instructors and peers, a structured learning environment, and opportunities for hands-on learning. However, it can be less flexible and convenient, requiring students to attend classes at specific times and locations.

In conclusion, the most effective learning method may vary depending on personal preferences, learning styles, and individual situations. It's important to carefully consider the pros and cons of each method and choose the one that best suits your needs.

In my experience I like both physical and online. becuses learning can be done in various ways through both these methods and it is our job to use it effectively. People have their own ways of learning. Both physical and online can have advantages and disadvantages, but whichever method is used, it is important to use it effectively.

Of course, the type of course is also effective in choosing the teaching method. For example, in the courses that are based on skill training, it is more appropriate to conduct the training in a face-to-face manner. But in general, the physical implementation of education is more effective in terms of the conditions it provides for the social education of learners.

Na minha experiência, em escolas públicas brasileiras, o ensino on-line tem menor alcance, tendo em vista a desigualdade no acesso aos equipamentos como smartphones, computadores, ou mesmo ao wi-fi. No entanto, reconheço que as abordagens on-line conseguiram desafiar os profissionais na busca e desenvolvimento de mecanismos de aprendizagem mais ativos e, certamente, isso pode ter impactado nas suas práticas, após o retorno presencial.

It's not about online or offline learning atmosphere. I think that for better learning we need to create constructive learning experience. In both mode its possible to integrate experiential learning strategies. So no need to compare between these two mode of learning.

online learning

Yes, physical learning methods seems to be the best since it allows for close monitoring, response, attention etc. because of the instructor’s presence. However, the choice of the best method to adopt at a particular time would depend on other factors such as distance, available resources, learning content and resource person needed among others. In the context of today’s world, I would advise blended learning (mixture of both – physical and online) as most suitable. Thank you.

The effectiveness of learning methods for higher studies can vary based on individual preferences and circumstances. Physical classroom learning offers face-to-face interaction and practical application, while online learning provides flexibility and convenience. When choosing the most effective method, it's important to consider personal preferences and the subject being studied.

It variates according to some factors: type of content; students' profile; amount of students enrolled; etc.

According to my experience, hybrid models tend to be the best format to teach, combining in person sessions, preparation online, group assessments and analytics tools.

Observing students, we can observe some that work better in class and others that develop more online in its own pace.

Also, when dealing with big number os students, the AI and analytics tools can help to identify students that need more attention among the group.

In my opinion, face-to-face education is not only to acquire access to content. But it is also a space where there are countless opportunities to permanently develop socio-emotional skills and acquire values to live in society. This 'other' type of learning, as important as the subjects and contents of the curricular plans, are more complex to stimulate in virtual environments. It's not that you can't, but they required additional efforts.

On the other hand, in virtual environments it is very easy to emphasize transactional aspects. That is to say, it is easy to use the telephone or an email to send materials or give access to different resources, but education is not only that. Motivation and the creation of student-teacher bonds also play a central role (eg empathy, building confidence to work as a team or knowing how to combine cognitive aspects with socio-emotional ones). Those who are deeply familiar with digital environments manage to overcome these difficulties more effectively, but this transition from face-to-face to remote is not automatic.

Another factor to take into account in distance education is that it usually registers higher dropout or abandonment rates. It is therefore key to generate and design spaces within virtual and distance education that are not limited to the delivery of content, but also offer mechanisms for monitoring, accompaniment, and reinforcement. It can be by the teacher or an auxiliary tutor, synchronous or asynchronous and can be done through a videoconference or with a phone call. But, fundamentally, it must be systematic and form part of a pedagogical strategy.

For this reason, I believe that face-to-face training is more appropriate for higher education.

I believe that there is no preference for one over the other, each with its advantages and characteristics, pros and cons. Education in the classroom, or what is called face-to-face education, ensures the creation of a social classroom environment that provides an educational and study climate dominated by interaction and cooperation, which relieves many of the psychological crises of the learners. On the other hand, e-learning leads us to talk about distance education. It is not a bad way. It is one of the effects of technology on education, which helped a lot in developing and facilitating education. It also created many opportunities for education for many groups of individuals. It also meets the requirements of learners who are proficient in using technology. Therefore, we can mix the two methods of education, classroom and distance education, and adopt what is called hybrid education.

​

According to my experiences, both online learning and physical classroom learning are the most effective learning method for higher studies. By these methods the lecturer can follow every development each student both the material or the method by using in learning.

I agree that both have their place. Time and money come into the online option. Face to face training offers more interaction and creates conversations. It also offers the opportunity for debate and allows students to question each others opinions in a controlled environment.

Both methods are good. The challenge with online is that you fail to reach out to the students. There are practical activities that students need to acquire in your module and as the lecturer I also like to see how they are going to implement the acquired skills. These impact learning and teaching in the Foundation Phase classes.