It seems the present method of evaluating students does not seem appropriate given access to vast knowledge in any field, via internet and search engines like Google.
Briely the present system relies on 'imparting" instructions, "developing skills as seen by a teacher or a Board of experts. Subsequently the students are evaluated via system of exminations . These examinations consist of questions which are kept confidential. Some of the questions are supposed to test the fundamental understanding as seen by the teacher. Some questions are "difficult" , the intent being to identify the "better" students.
This system in general suffers from , need for maintaining security, promoting rote learning , discouraging team discussions, occluding original doubts of the laws in the subject (which may actually lead to new frontiers).
A different approach could be to publish the question bank well in time and pose only a selected set for a conventional type of examination. This allows discussion among students, possible research via search engines, and possible new perceptions of young minds .In this method of evaluation, a separate section where students do not answer but raise "good" questions could also be incorporated. This would give credit for being creative and involved, sorely lacking in present system. This is an explorative view for a better education model in the era of the Internet. Would welcome views from all.
Cheers