No you better try laparoscopy in order to know the anatomy and then decide if you can do it by laparoscopy or you must open the abdomen and the incision.
It depends on several factors.
First, is the patient stable hemodinamically?
If the patient is stable, maybe will be better to do a laparoscopy.
Second, is the patient nulliparous?
If the patient is multiparous, laparoscopy salpingectomy could be the best option. But In nulliparous patients, depending on the possibilities of access to ART, the decision will be between laparoscopic salpingectomy or medical treatment with methotrexate, for those who can only achieve another pregnancy through natural fertilization
If it is unruptured and fits in to criteria for medical management , can be offered otherwise laparoscopic salpingostomy or salpingectomy , depending on tubal pathology is the right way to go .
It depends on many factors if the patient hemodynamicaly unstable then laparotomy might be considered and because it is recurrent adhesions might be seen during laparoscopy this might make endoscopic salpigoplasty imopsible or difficult so every case should be individualized .
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Comment