First, I would like to thank you Dr.Mohamed El Naschie for answering my question, it is a great honor for me to be answered by such a great scientist as you, and you are always a great idol for the Egyptian young researchers.
Second, I would like to discuss my reasons behind asking this question I am making a research that aims to study the time and trying to know the scientific reasons behind the succession of events and the time passage, and I found that in order to understand the time and trying to define it in a scientific way I should ask myself some universal questions and this question was one of them.
I agree that the practical answer for the time is logic but I feel like still not satisfying
However, you have kindly asked another question which is also related to the situation .. WHY THERE IS SOMETHING INSTEAD OF NOTHING ??
I think that the (NOTHING) is the common in the universe, while the (THINGS) is an addition that had been added for a certain purpose for a specific period of time by a super power which does not undergo our rules or logic thinking .. for science it might be unknown but as a Muslim I can call the process a "creation" and the creator is " الله سبحانه و تعالي "
So, the (something) is for a reason and for a time
The (nothing) is the basic
And by applying scientific evidence:
What are the differences between (The things) and (The nothings)?
The answer is: the only difference between (the things) and (the nothings) is that (the thing) has time while (the nothing) has no time.
So, in order to discuss the difference between (the things) and (the nothings) we should know previously:
What is the scientific reason behind the presence of time (the succession of events)?
The answer is: Due to the motion.
So, the difference between (the things) and (the nothings) is that (the things) is moving while (the nothings) isn't moving.
So, in case if (the things) stop moving it will be (nothings).
My work involves developing methodology for discipline-spanning transdisciplinary understanding that enhances communication between the disciplines. To develop the methodology it is necessary to examine and compare the real-world subject matters of the various disciplines.
While using transdisciplinary methods to develop an understanding of the intrinsic nature of space, I unexpectedly came upon the basis of time in the universe.
In the universe, the form of change that is the continuing-existence of space plays all the roles that can be realistically attributed to time.
(This is the continuing-existence of space as measured by a clock, not the extension of three-dimensional space as measured by a ruler.)
Understanding how spatial-continuing-existence plays the roles of time provides the answers to the questions: What is time?, Why does time occur?, and Why does time have the specific qualities that it has?
There is a paper on ResearchGate.net and Academia.edu. titled, The Identification of the Intrinsic Nature of Time, that provides the understanding of how spatial-continuing-existence plays the roles of time.
I hope that understanding the intrinsic nature of time will be useful to you.
Regards,
Vincent Vesterby
Vesterby, Vincent. 2014. The Identification of the Intrinsic Nature of Time.