Thanks sir for this word of advice on professionalism.

Very good question, the same thing crossed my mind.  But not all RG members behave in that manner.  Some of us do interact with persons who answer our question, and upvote answers that provide useful information that those persons have supplied.  Be sure that without the help of some RG members, I wouldn't be able to write as much.  I have had friends who sent me full texts, a current copy of stats software, who proofread my papers and did wonderful services.  I thank them and RG, in my papers.

Article Motivation and Achievement of Malaysian Students in Studying...

Dear Rafic:

Keep your address to ask a question.

Regards

Dear Yuri,

Do you mean my ResearchGate address?

Best wishes,

Rafik

Dear Rafic:

I mean your appeal to those researchers who do not respond or do not thank for answers. Your profile is impressive.

Regards.

Dear Yuri,

I will. Many thanks for the complement.

Rafik

Yes. I agree with you, Marković.

Rafik

Dear Marković,

As suggested by Yuri, would it be possible to distribute this question in the similar manner to that you have done for your questions.

You may change the phrasing and keep the content.

Thanks,

Rafik

I use to answer some question, even sometimes I feel sad when I see some question without any answer. Some RG members just profit to upload papers and never answer or add some coments. In the current time is very important we share knowledge. I use to see good reseacher and respect than when I see the pie chart showing significant percent of answer, questions and publication. If is only publication I realise that most of scientist are not at all. Rafik Karaman is the one active and his score show the Great scientist profile. Doent mind degree.

my words exactly! @ question

Thank you for asking this question. I really wish to know!!

In my opinion, it may be due to poor contribution.

Dears Rathish & Ramesh,

Thanks for valuable comments.

Rafik

Dear Rafik Karaman,

"This time can be devoted to those persons who really are in urgent need to get answers to their questions."

Most of these people do not need prompt answers. They are only lazy guys who are not able to type some keywords into the browser. They are incompetent as researcher.

I strongly support Peter Kapusta. I am not satisfied with your answers.

You give a large body of answers in different kind of questions. Are you an expert in all of these topics? Most of these answers seem to cheap, effusive and  sometimes misleading.

 Dear Péter Szabó,

I respect your opinion although I completely disagree with it.

Before accusing a person of doing wrong you should provide an evidence.

You wrote that my answers seem to be cheap. How did you reach to this conclusion especially that you are NOT familiar with the topics that I have discussed and answered.

Regarding if I know all of these topics, the answer is yes. I know very well every question that I answer. You can not imagine how much I know.

It seems that I should list all topics that I am familiar with:

1-Chemistry (organic, physical organic, environmental analytical and computational chemistry.

2-Pharmacy (Industrial, pharmaceutics, pharmacology, drug delivery and pharmacology).

3-Math & Physics I was number one among all students in these two subjects.

The list is very long and frankly, I do not have time to elaborate.

One thing that I can not understand, why you & Peter are so concerned about my QA. Have you got complains from RG members that my answers are wrong. IT SEEMS THAT SOME THING ELSE IS THE REASON. 

I already wrote to Peter that a person gets upvote on a correct answer and not on a cheap and wrong answer.

I Believe that we live in a democratic world. Every person has the right to choose his way and approach. This is called a FREEDOM. It seems that you and Peter do not believe in democracy and freedom. I think the time has arrived to start believing that people differ and not all of them are similar. 

I AM NOT INTERESTED TO CONTINUE THIS KIND OF DISCUSSION, NOT WITH YOU NEITHER WITH PETER.

I WISH YOU A HAPPY LIFE AND FRUITFUL RESEARCH.

Rafik

Dear Rafik Karaman,

"It seems that you and Peter do not believe in democracy and freedom"

I am a very young guy (I believe in democracy), but in my opinion there is no democracy in science. I love the science because only the truth matters here. It is pure, there is no place for indistinct ideas like democracy. The discussions, arguments and criticism are the natural inherent of the building of science.

"You wrote that my answers seem to be cheap. How did you reach to this conclusion especially that you are NOT familiar with the topics that I have discussed and answered."

I am familiar and expert some of the mentioned topics:

environmental analytical and computational chemistry, Math & Physics.

I do not need only the half of the truth from the answers. I am a greedy person who want the pure and unbroken truth.

A minimal response to a helpful Answer would be an acknowledgment, a Recommendation, or both.

A detailed response to an Answer would not seem to be necessary unless it contributes to an ongoing discussion.

Asking a Question does not require an academic to respond to Answers, though it would be polite to do so.

Dear, you are right. But I think that it is not a matter of not responding to the time of the respondent but it is much more difficult to comment on the other's answer than to ask the question.

Follow

I agree with the previous three answers by Michael John McAleer, Chia-Lin Chang and Elizabeta Hristovska. Unfortunately, my recent exprerience in some RG questions/answers concerning Mathematical areas and Applications shows that the simple reason is that in these cases those RG members who ask questions are not experts in a related scientific area.