Dear Agha, Probably because it is a more informal setting and more targeted at personal friends. Other sites such as RG linkedin would be more suitable to engaging in academic discourses!
I was on FB for 8 years.. my inbox was full of letters of consultations, as well many people regard the FB friendship is a real bond, so he got angry of you don't reply him. As well the FB is the largest source of lying.
Loss of watches, wasting time and too many businesses that can benefit the individual and the benefit of the others, most notably the worship of God for
I am strongly recommend this idea. I have no FB account, and it is better to spend our valued time in a pure academic social media like our beloved one ResearchGate.
I personally visit facebook daily as you follow the news of your friends and relatives. Currently, the most important platform that I visit many times a day is Research Gate.
Encouraging lies and hypocrisy, through the phenomenon of pseudonyms, and fictional characters, especially in the services of the conversations in various forms, where the owners deal with multiple personalities and many aspects, most of which sacrifice values, ethics and constants at the expense of desires
It is a wide-open space, so everyone makes a point, and the individual, the values and the correct self-control, along with the proper upbringing, is the one who determines the best way to benefit from the social networking sites, in order to achieve his interest properly, away from deviation and loss.
The social networking sites have many advantages, including self development and development through the acquisition of active communication skills and mechanisms, and the achievement of creativity in various areas of life, through the exchange of experiences, through social communication. Strengthen social relations, with renewed friends through them. Self-expression, through individual or collective conversations. Follow the latest developments around the world by following the updates that appear through friends, or follow up on your interests list. Providing the effort and cost of communicating with friends or distant relatives geographically. Meet hobbies, get to know each other's hobbies, and constantly promote them. To improve the personality of the individual through his cultural capacity and his integration with the cultural environment electronically. Contribute to the criticism directed and constructive, and affect the political decision-maker, in accordance with the public interest. Economic advertising, through the publication of advertisements for their owners. Intellectual and cultural propaganda, where owners find easy platforms for them to express their ideas and advocate for their culture.
Facebook is not for the serious professor. It is more suitable for those who have a lot of time in their hands and perhaps looking for someone else to pat them on their backs with "Likes." A professor need not look for phony comments and fake conversations with unknown persons; if their research is genuine people will hear about it through legitimate sources such as journals, conference papers and patents.
The degree of participation in Facebook is relatively different from one professor to another and is not related to a specific category. That's all there is to it, that there is someone who wishes and the other does not want to.
As far as I see it, different generations and professions use Facebook for different purposes. Young generations often use it for „social purposes “, for contacts, although the problem is that they do not realize negative aspects (alienation, less of communication skills, incredible desire to have more „friends “and likes, spending incredible amount of time on mobile devices, being away from real tasks, decreased need to learn, and above all, mobbing and showing personal and indoor private information). Middle generation does realize problems, but it's hard (almost impossible) to manage it.
Professors, being covered with amount of different tasks, realize the need to be acquainted with social network (e.g. communication with group) and to comment it with pupils, students. Social network can be useful source to collect data and investigate behaviour of users. Another problem is use of data…
I do not know if we can generalize that teachers do not use FB because they know several teachers they use with students and others who do not use for total lack of interest
Needless to say, There is no academic space and scientific argues in that site. To me, research gate is the best site for scientific topics and improve knowledge about any fild