Why is the Kp and Ap indices more relevant in the characterization of geomagnetic disturbed or quiet conditions than the Dst index. I will also appreciate it if I can get relevant literatures to submit the claim
Mr. Babatunde, you can refer the following article as it favors your question and other related to this one. you can find more insight by looking in to articles on long term comparison and correlation between different indices such as this one.
please refer to Summary and Conclusion part where it is clearly mentioned that range indices have high correlation than Dst.
Quoted as: "Range" indices appear to be more affected by the high frequency content of magnetic activity than “mean” indices (such as Dst).
Article: On secular changes of correlation between geomagnetic indices
and variations in solar activity
Article On secular changes of correlation between geomagnetic indice...
1. Rostoker G., 1972, Geomagnetic indices, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., vol. 10, pp. 935-950.
2. Mayaud P.N., 1980, Derivation, meaning and use of geomagnetic indices, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., vol. 22, AGU, Washington DC, p. 154.
3. Joselyn J.A., 1995, Geomagnetic activity forecasting: state of the art, Rev. Geophys., vol. 33, pp. 383-401.
4. Campbell W.H., 1997, Introduction to geomagnetic fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
and -maybe-
5. Saba M.M.F., W.D. Gonzalez and A.L. Clua de Gonzalez, 1997, Relationship between AE, ap and Dst during solar maximum (1979) and solar minimum (1974), Ann. Geophys., vol. 15, pp. 1265-1270.