Isn't it more appropriate to speak of a rest mass for the Planck particle, in addition to its mass as a black hole-like particle? Furthermore, wouldn't it be more appropriate to speak of protons and neutrons each possessing a pair of masses: a particle-like black hole mass and a rest mass?
In short, physics knows neither the rest mass of the Planck particle nor the masses of protons and neutrons as quantum black holes. It is therefore necessary to complete them!
Because general relativity implies that an object of mass greater than or equal to the Planck mass and of size less than or equal to the Planck length is a black hole.
A proton or a neutron have finite masses and sizes (they aren't point-like) that don't satisfy this bound. That's why they aren't black holes.
In addtion, it should be stressed that black holes are objects that are defined within classical gravity; so a ``quantum black hole'' doesn't make sense. What the object is, whose classical limit would be a black hole, isn't known, because quantum gravity isn't understood to that degree of detail.
For the moment, what is known is what could be (some of the properties of) the objects that could account for the finite entropy of (certain classes of) black holes, in the presence of quantum matter.
Stam Nicolis,
In my theory of absolute physics the formula E=mc² is crucial to explain that the rest mass of a particle comes from that same particle as a quantum black hole. In other words: no quantum black hole no rest mass of a quantum particle. In fact in this theory E=mc² has another exactly equivalent twin formula which is E=Mb², where M is the mass of the quantum particle as a black hole and b would be a new physical constant that I will describe in detail in my book of absolute physics which will be published, I hope, by the end of the year by a publisher. For example the mass of the black hole neutron is M= 5.91 10^11 kg.
But my preprint* shows that there is a close link between the quantum black holes and the cosmological black holes. The *preprint shows that the black hole of cygnus X-1 is a fundamental constant it contains exactly 10^58 neutrons which makes its mass of schwaezschild easy to calculate using the neutron mass.
*Preprint: A new Formula for the Schwarzschild Mass leads to the Calculus of the Absolutely Exact Number of Neutrons of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1
Stam Nicolis,
This means that it is very easy to dtermine the neutron radius from the radius of the black hole in cygnus X-1. This links the quantum world to the cosmological world.
Stam Nicolis,
According to the theory of absolute physics, where I give the physical constants in absolute values as in my preprints*, the proton and the neutron are quantum black holes, each made up of 10^38 PRIMORDIAL PARTICLES, which I call "PRIMITIVE PARTICLES," and it is these primitive particles that are made up of up and down quarks.
Since each proton (or neutron) black hole actually contains 10^38 primitive particles, COLLIDERS are therefore black hole "CRUCHERS"!
*Preprint: Absolute Frequencies of Strontium Atomic Clocks from Theoretical Dimensionless Ratios of Strontium frequencies to Quartz Frequency.
*Preprint: An Absolutely Exact Duration in seconds of the Sidereal day, or Stellar day, emerging from an Irreducible Numerical Ratio from Ultimate Cosmology, Astronomy, and Astrophysics.
*Preprint: An Irreducible Numerical Ratio for the Duration in Days of the Mean Sidereal Year via Ultimate Cosmology, Astronomy, and Astrophysics.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Molecular Dynamics