China is the world’s second largest economy. China’s economic expansion earns it a spot among states that developed earlier, and in far different global economic and political environments.
China controls on corruption and poverty, thats why role model for underdeveloped states
I like India more because it has a greater potential with a democratic system to help it become successful.
Experimentation at the local level, internal competition, pragmatism, large skilled entrepreneurial population (significant improvements in basic education and healthcare preceded and supported economic reforms of the late 1970s). Large, diverse & highly-skilled diaspora.
China is the world’s second largest economy. China’s economic expansion earns it a spot among states that developed earlier, and in far different global economic and political environments.
China is big country in different field such as economic, technology, sciences....etc
They are an inspiration to other countries the way they have come from behind and are now a leader in the world economy. China may be blamed for unethical practices or for stealing patents - remember the Japanese were blamed in the 1970's and 1980's for copying western technologies? However, China has perseverance, human resources, the willingness to learn and innovate, ambition and vision that makes it a role model for other developing countries.
We can get direction of good works, share the experiences, but practically NO country can be a role model for another country.
As the people, their culture, the natural resources etc. are different among countries, the thing happened in China by following one way may not happen in your country follwing the same way.
But experience of China may assist during formation of a good plan for development of your country.
China's determination and will for developments, inspires others. However I agree with Shibabrata Pattanayak , by his statement that each countries have differences in their needs and culture, and therefore no any country can be role model for others. Each country has to learn from its experiences.
China has modified its communist structure for better results.
Democracy sometimes fails to take strict decisions. Democracy can't be imagined where political class has seized all the power in it and democracy is being captivated in some hands and families.
India has to win its social conflicts in terms of caste-ism where caste-based identity is dominant on national interests often.
Chinese people are very hard-working and they have inherent excellent business views on all sectors. Also, they are distributed around the world. So, they can get the good supports from their links.
It could be simplified using infrastructure and the effective efficient use of that infrastructure. It is however, a complex interdisiplinary undertaking that is predicated on government and accessibility. Open markets are fundamental to global trade.
In simply manner, China is a creative nation.
Wishes,
Naseer Almukhtar
Considering the question of China as a role model, is a difficult one. It, however, is not unfathomable. China has come a long way from its revolution, and the communist party of Mao Zedong. “Market Socialism” was instituted under Deng Xiaoping after Mao’s death. Deng Xiaoping opened China to the world. The current constitution was created in 1982 and has been revised many times. As far as constitutions go, more often than not, they say one thing and do something entirely different. Pretty much the status quo for the constitutions of countries.
Mao developed his own version of communism, “Maoism.” Maoism is an interpretation in the strong communist tradition developed after and during the Sino-Soviet split of the 1950's. I personally do not believe that any large country can be truly communist. Communism is an ideology that has never really existed in any actionable form other than corruption, using a totalitarian government, which is as far from ideological communism as we can get.
China is successful because they adapted. The world became a better place after the Lenin’s, the Stalin’s, the Mao’s, the Hitler’s and the Mussolini’s of the world died.
Complicating matters further, is the fact that there are still two parties claiming legitimacy over the nation of "China." The Chinese mainland, the recognized legitimate authority in China is the Peoples Republic of China the (PRC). In Taiwan there is the Republic of China (PRC) from the time of Chiang Kai-shek as the Nationalist leader of China. Both consider the other to be illegitimate. The PRC is not generally recognized as the legitimate leader of China.
After WWII a civil war broke out between the Kuomintang led by Chiang Kai-shek and the communists led by Mao. The communists won. Chiang Kai-shek, the nationalist leader, became exiled on the island of Taiwan. Some ambiguity exists but, the world recognizes the Beijing government, as the legitimate government of China today.
The question of Taiwan is still a question. It is both a yes and a no, concerning Taiwan’s independence today. If you like models, try that one.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Graphs