Two stronger arguments for black holes existence are
** detection of radiation from a acreation discs, indadescent ratiation emitting material, that matches theory
** radiation in 3021from a creation diska consistent with bh's of billion masses of suns absorbing material from quasar
Why then, has the term still being immersed in a veil of suspicion and held captive in the mad-science domain?
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularity-inside-black-hole/
The link above attempts to explain the paradox. Ultimately, classical black hole 'theory' proposes a point-like singularity within a black hole of infinite density. No one has ever proven such a thing. The wikipedia article for gravitational singularity touches on how an established theory for quantum gravity would help solve the dilemma of singularities.
Black holes are real objects, but the idea of a singularity is very suspicious.
Because continuum theories are often invalid near the sigularities they predict.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning