Unconventional/Philosophy has a specific answer, but in order to be accepted as philosophy, it must be compared to what mankind thought until the present moment, (the comparison is also valid for the anwers of philosophy). Thus, we will compare your answers to the meanings of this philosophy. According to the answer of the Unconventional/Philosophy, all these, similar to many others, are simultaneous. Our arguments are numberless
- we cannot separate the matter form the idea, the matter from the energy, space from time or freedom from constraint.
- each defines the other, more precisely, the matter defines the idea, whereas the idea defines that matter, or the matter defines the energy that it comprehends and the energy define sthe matter it shapes. Time defines space and space defines its time, such as freedom defines the constraint released, while the constraint defines the freedom of that constraintʼs release.
We will bring one more argument, as, in our opinion, there are plenty of solid arguments.
- according to Quantum Physics, there are two different universes: one is called system and the other is called chaos. Some people sustain there are two parallel universes. As a matter of fact, there is one single universe, such as the chaos/system simultaneity. The difference between chaos and system is that we cannot know all the parameters of a phenomenon, or entity/universe and this is the reason why what we come to know appears as chaos, as system. In other terms, we perceive their simultaneity chaos or system, in relation to the system of reference we compare them to. The freedom and constraint represent the same thing, that is freedom/constraint, but that we ourselves, because of our limits and of the limited systems of reference, see as two different things. For example, the abolishment of slavery stood for freedom, in the case of many slaves, whereas for others, it represented a constraint, demonstrated by the fact they did not leave their places. We cannot call freedom the permission of a man to do anything he wants on a desert island or in the desert, although under other circumstances, having no duties stands for freedom. Any physical, chemical, scientific or nonscientific relation is a constraint, but the fact that each of us wants to release his atoms and molecules, aiming at self-annihilation, is absurd. Although therea re numberless examples, we hope we made ourselves understood.
Dear Tudor,
Philosophy is wide and depends on someone's experience which create its level of wisdom. in physical world we can refer to ontology or existing reality, constraints ad matter are more important check this link: http://ijetst.in/article/v3-i7/3%20ijetst.pdf and read page 5 on important words of Socrates the second one.
I am really grateful for the attention you paid to my question. Unfortunately, I must point out the fact that Socrates, Aristotle, and others cannot offer answers for the third millenium, on the one hand, because in those times, there were no questions and answers, on the other hand because, if we were able to go back into the past to ask them for certain answers, they could not offer us those answers, in the absence of the present evolution of both sciences and non sciences. Their ideas materialized on a sheet of paper or another form of matter/energy represent for us simple parables, due to the lack in those times of certain laborious conventions, able to limit the interpretations. Any word or idea is a parable due to the absence of these present conventions that can make things clear. People have always tried and are still trying to limit the meanings through other conventions, although the limitation of interpretations is impossible. Other interpretations will always take shape. Our own interpretations on their materialized ideas are not their ideas, they are our ideas, irrespective of the kind of interpretation. We cannot deal directly with ideas specific to another form of organization, (entity/universe), but only with unlimited intermediaries, from senses to nerves, or instruments, devices, etc., which certainly make reference to other ideas, different from those belonging to Socrates or Aristotle. We must offer answers related to the present, not to the past, answer questions asked by both the ordinary people and scholars. Sometimes we are faced with questions whose answers we will never be able to discover.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Philosophy