This is only a preliminary introductory answer to clarify the question and admit that nature produces randomness/disorder which is an increase in entropy S according to the indisputable second law of thermodynamics dS>=0.
However, for example, an isolated system subject to Dirichlet boundary conditions, it can be shown that in the time-dependent 4D process,
an increase in entropy leads to more symmetry.
In other words, the probability of nature itself operates in 4D x-t unit space and produces a kind of symmetry.
then how should this finding be compared with statement like "nature itself operates ... and produces a kind of symmetry" - what a symmetry is seen here when the result is cancer mutations - technically, resulting and coming from randomness in nature ...
In my opinion, the symmetry created by nature is most closely described by a class of theorems, generically called the "central limit theorem". Deviations from the conditions of the central limit theorem (dependence of factors, dominance of one or more factors, etc.) generate asymmetry, which is observed in nature much more often than symmetry.