I need to find support prior to submission because the journal editors are sabotaging my paper’s chances by refusing to even do a peer review of what is a perfect qualified and rigorous paper.
They dishonestly bypass the quality control that would have my controversial paper published.
I need a professor of physics with the balls to kick the ass of the system into the next epoch in the name of science.
My paper Angular Energy shows that fundamentals need to be overturned.
The paper has never been genuinely shown to contain any error, because I have honed it to perfection over years of unforeseen and unfortunately hostile debate, by listening to everything.
The only thing it needs is to be published in a peer reviewed journal in order to be taken seriously and it must be taken seriously.
I already proved in the following videos that you are ridiculously wrong:
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 1: https://youtu.be/RE-6s1B-lc8
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 2: https://youtu.be/abuPJesWQRY
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 3: https://youtu.be/Sd5p7wzrzAQ
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 4: https://youtu.be/zw1lF0zH1qs
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 5: https://youtu.be/1Sdv9S1df1M
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 6: https://youtu.be/w-C2XtjnSik
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 7: https://youtu.be/V5Ry2SzdY_s
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 8: https://youtu.be/mYOL7UCdrf0
- The Mandlbaur Insanity - Part 9: https://youtu.be/A2evqQ6nWoQ
How long are you gonna keep making a fool of yourself?
I also illustrated on the following website the blatant liar that you are (like when you claimed that SpaceX successfully managed to make their rockets land after you sent Elon Musk an email with your ridiculous theory): https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists-JohnMandlbaur.php
You promised that you would concede if you couldn’t fault my maths. Then i showed you my maths and you have failed to fault it andfailrd to concede.
Now you have made up new pseudoscience uounfrasu.
"You promised that you would concede if you couldn’t fault my maths."
Indeed, I made this promise. And as can be testified by anyone who followed our public discussion, I faulted you math, thus I don't have to concede anything. Here is again your mistake: The correct equation is dL/dt = torque. Your torque is non-zero, thus dL/dt is non-zero, therefore angular momentum is not conserved.
V. G. Rousseau You promised you would concede and you lied and refuse to concede.
It has never in history been accepted to say "calculate friction" and neglect a theoretical physics paper.
Quit lying and making a fool of yourself in front of the entire web. Get a life!
Nope, you prove only that you are prepared to make up new pseudoscience before you will concede that you cant fault my maths. Which makes you an academic frayd. So it mist be you who is wrong
Thank you for the suggestion.
I am already online here with my papers, so what would be the advantage?
I have to get published in a peer reviewed journal because otherwise nobody takes my work seriously.
This is not about being published for personal or career reasons. I am not even an academic and care not about having any publications.
This is about the importance of what I have discovered.
"I have to get published in a peer reviewed journal"
LOL
This will never happen. For those who don't know the crackpot John Mandlbaur, here is his biography: https://bluemoonshine.fun/Project-Pseudo-Scientists-JohnMandlbaur.php
The fact that you needed to make is insulting and fraudulent vidoes proves that you cannot genuinely fault my maths because 12000 rpm is literally the textbook method of predicting the example.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence