Quote: " All current Physics has based on paradigm of non-enforced inertial motion, which borned in Antic Greece. Isaac Newton declared it as First Law of Mechanics aka Inertia Law."

Not really. Newton's Principia published in 1684 explains that Kepler's conclusion about Ticho Brahe's data reveals that astronomical bodies attract each other with a force obeying the inverse square of the distances separating them.

The concept of inertia related to gravitation was introduced by Einstein with his General Relativity theory published in 1915, in which no force is involved, and that the motion of astronomical bodies is explained by their inertial acceleration according to the curvature of the spacetime fabric that he hypothesized, curvature that was created by the masses of the astronomical bodies.

The interaction between two point-like behaving charged particles was experimentally established by Coulomb about a hundred years after Newton published Principia, that is, in 1787 as obeying the same interaction law between charges that Newton identified between masses.

Electromagnetic mechanics establishes that since all atoms of which all masses are made are charged particles, and that momentum energy is induced by the Coulomb force in each charged particle, it is the vectorial resultant of the momentum energy induced in each charged particles of which all astronomical masses are made as a function of the inverse of the distances separating them oriented towards other charged particles is what explains Kepler's conclusions about the data collected by Brahe for astronomical bodies and consequently validates Newton's conclusion, because the Coulomb force was proven to obey the same interaction law for the charge of the electron that Newton identified as applying to masses as that of the electron.

How could one-dimension Newtonian law can describe three-dimension of nature that it is changing constantly?

Unfortunately we are following wrong science of past, that never been tested.

Article The Mythos of Gravity Or (Newtonian and Einsteinian Gravity is a Myth)

Nothing will happen. It is always possible to describe the effects of non-inertial motion as the result of the action of forces on inertial motion, whether in the Newtonian approximation, or in the context of general relativity.

Dear Kanat Abildinov ,

The question is very good... However, if we take any aspect of your question as a basis, it means reducing reality too much. If we are looking for the answer to the question, I think it should be fair to take both situations into account. I don't want to answer why... but there would be a concrete answer.

Regardless of the question... I slowly came up with a next experiment

Research Proposal Addendum to 'A Simple Experiment to Support an EM Gravity Theory'

I made a 'simple presentation'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5dZ3VQXf6A

What do you think about it?

I don't have the money to do it

I know under what conditions it could be done

Regards,

Laszlo

P.S: The answer to your question is simple