01 January 1970 9 4K Report

My supervisor has done his PhD from America. Sir told me that in America the general procedure is to make supervisor last one in the author list no matter how much he have contributed. Sounded strange to me.

Now, say I am supervising three students. Student number 1 and I contributed the most. We worked to develop the ideas, proved the ideas and so on. Now, as a supervisor should I take the position of last author in the publication OR should I be the second?

What's the best practice and What is the right thing to do! I'm a little confused.

Similar questions and discussions