Third wave feminists argue that even women who have suffered abuse and economic deprivation have agency (at least limited agency) and can "freely" consent to working in the sex trade. Can choices be free even in the context of economic necessity?
I wonder whether mothers who marry off their daughters at early ages are at least partially financially motivated.
And I wonder what role economics plays in the shaping the sexual identity of women (like Miley Cyrus) whose education may have been curtailed at an early age in favour of starting to work in the music industry by age nine, an industry that demands exhibitionism from performers.
i got a friend doing an eco-feminist study to certain Nigerian female writers. he argues that owning a piece of land could empower women economically , thus help in the re-formation of female identity away of masculine discourses