Is there any suggested weighing scale for IEEE peer reviewed conference publications, when comparing to journal articles ?.
In fact, I have seen many IEEE conference papers that are quite novel and unique. Even some conference papers got huge number of citations. While from the "traditional" point of view, some researches consider conference papers as second-
level publications.
What do you think ?
90% of IEEE conferences are genuine and they are following strict reviews. For eg., industrial Application Society Annual Records, TENCON, POWERCN, INDICON and PEDS are standard IEEE conference and they have equa status of Journals. However, 10% of IEEE conferences are fake and for sake of money they are being conducted and this 10% spoils the name of IEEE. Not only that, many of other society conferences are also fakes. So, reputation on conference publication is coming down. For the award of PhD degree, hence conference papers publications are not considered.
Citations will be more if the work is novel and unique.
Journals - Not all the journals are genuine. More Impact Factor value journals only to be compared.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Telecommunications Engineering