Dear Rajendra Kumar Mohapatra, I would say that nowadays you should not worry about PD in DB. This unity was used in the past when the same instrument was used for RIV and PD measurements. Even the quantification of PD only in amplitude using PC (apparent charge) as unit is a poor technique nowadays. I would suggest you to deal with 2D or 3D digital maps related to PD measurements provided by digital PD measuring systems where you can obtain more valuable information such as PD histogram x phase or time of occurrence and associated statistical analysis, for instance. Please check IEC 60270: HIGH-VOLTAGE TEST TECHNIQUES — PARTIAL DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS. Best Regards, Orsino
pC is purely determined by the type of sensor u are using.If u are using HFCT then it dependents on the tranfer impedance value, bandwidth and measured amplitude in (V or mV). HFCT usually has bandwidth 20 Mhz (being very optimistic). However when capacitive sensor is used then the impedance and capacitance of the antenna/sensor can be measured using network analyser and with those values pC can be calculated. Basically u dont need the value in dB for PD. Usually dB is measured for continuous signal(RF power, noise, acoustic) and not pulse type signal.
Previously I was haunted by this question too. Now I'm with the opinion that under certain controlled condition, the correlation can be linear. However for complex, a real world scenario (e.g. in power transformer), there are evidences that linear relationship is not possible.