An Afrocentric approach became my first thought to the question of what critical literary approach could be best to analyse Sierra Leonean literature, but I think that the analysis of Sierra Leonean literature necessitates a critical approach that integrates local cultural, historical, and societal contexts while acknowledging the broader influences of Western literary frameworks. Key considerations include postcolonial criticism, which examines how colonialism, resistance, identity, and cultural preservation are represented in the works, and an Afrocentric literary critique, which emphasizes African-centered perspectives and values without subsuming them under Western norms.

Historical and sociological approaches provide a rich backdrop for Sierra Leonean literature, focusing on historical reflection and social critique. Oral storytelling traditions, such as proverbs, myths, and folktales, heavily influence Sierra Leonean literature, with focus areas on adaptation and preservation, performance, and community. Comparative frameworks are also relevant, as many writers grapple with reconciling indigenous experiences with Western literary forms, often creating hybrid texts.

To address challenges posed by reliance on Western literary norms, scholars and critics should develop local literary theories, engage with writers and cultural custodians, and bridge frameworks. By doing so, they can create more representative theories, understand the intentions and cultural grounding of authors, and fully capture the essence of Sierra Leonean literature. This blended approach not only honors Sierra Leone's unique literary identity but also situates it within global literary discourse.