Hello,

When a person shows a consistent result that is above average, that result can be called "super". For example, knowing from neuroscience that decision-making is mainly supported in the frontal lobe, one would not expect teenagers to make good decisions, whereas the frontal lobe matures in their late twenties. By using a stastical theory of belief, as the probability that supports a claim (DS), and studying statistics, a teenager can achieve an un-natural capacity for decision-making though, way above the peers. That would qualify, as a "superpower" for "super decision-making".

Mutatis mutandis, in the question, super consciousness applies in this case. So, not only some unspecified "development" could lead to super consciousness, to un-natural consciousness on the positive spectrum, but targeted scientific development can explain at least part of the cases.

This is well-known also in the field of intelligence research, and is supposed to be the reason for the Flynn effect, and early developmental progress (beyond Piaget's and Erikson's expected levels).

Natural Science, thus, can offer an explanation, further discussed in https://www.researchgate.net/post/If_any_process_in_the_brain_can_be_described_in_natural_science_terms_why_cant_the_mind

Cheers, Ed Gerck