A great many people learn moral standards at home, at school, or in other social settings. Albeit a great many people secure their feeling of good and bad amid youth, moral improvement happens all through life and individuals go through various phases of development as they develop. Moral standards are ubiquitous to the point that one may be enticed to see them as basic conventional. Then again, if profound quality were just rational, at that point why are there such huge numbers of moral debate and issues in our general public?
Can ethical norms in research help to build public support for research .
With ethics one searches the good things and rejects (avoids) bad things.
Ethics is definitely the most important issue in science, because without ethics the scientists could become monsters. However it happened not so long ago (for instance experiments of Dr Mengele in Aushwitz) and unfortunately it still happeing right now (cloning for instance). From these reasons the ethics is important or otherwise the educated sociopats could do whatever they want, if they will have a good financiers for their research.
Ethics in research takes several forms. First, it is the responsible treatment of the subjects of a study. Kant's third categorical serves here. While they are subjects they are not objects and the treatment of subjects must be honest, open, and responsible. Then there is the ethical organization of data and its presentation. This means not slanting the resulting report to fit preconceptions and prejudices. Finally, it is about a researcher's relation to society-at-large, and one's readers. Some research may be so injurious that its ethical appropriateness is in question. Usually, this deals with the prior areas (treatment of subjects, for example). See my Ethics in Everyday Life on this.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Ethics