Which is/are the indicator of good scientific contribution? Is it the number of research items or the number of reads of one's publications or number of citations from one's publications or all of these three things?
Emad Kamil Hussein
Popular answer
Presentation Journal Impact Factors, Researcher h-index, How to improve r...
3 votes
1 thanks
Alain Mwamba Mukendi
A good scientific is not relative to number of publications, reads or citations.
One paper of a good quality, informative can alone stand for a great scientific achievement.
Knowing that more reads does not necessary mean more citations I also believe they both not reliable parameters "that is my opinion".
2 votes
1 thanks
Emad Kamil Hussein
Presentation Journal Impact Factors, Researcher h-index, How to improve r...
3 votes
0 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Citations
More Harasit Kumar Paul's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions