Hello everyone,

I am currently simulating a MASnI₃ (Methylammonium Tin Iodide) perovskite solar cell using SCAPS, and I've encountered an issue that I need help resolving.

When I use the default absorption coefficient model provided in SCAPS, I obtain reasonable solar cell efficiency values. However, when I apply a custom absorption coefficient (based on external data extracted from a published paper on MASnI₃), the efficiency of the cell increases to 55%, which exceeds the Shockley-Queisser limit for a single-junction solar cell.

My questions for the community are:

  • What could be causing this efficiency to exceed the Shockley-Queisser limit when using my custom absorption coefficient?
  • Are there any common pitfalls when importing or defining custom absorption coefficients for perovskite solar cells in SCAPS that could lead to such inflated results?
  • Thank you in advance for any insights or suggestions you can provide!

    More Sehili Ammar's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions