The starting point of thermodynamic logic is: 1) opposing perpetual motion. 2) The irreversibility of dynamics. Let's look at how to get Carnot efficiency = 1-T1/T2.

1.1 There are many kinds of type 2 perpetual motors, each of which is a natural phenomenon.

A) Machine A: against the irreversibility of thermodynamics (diffusion, heat conduction, friction, etc) - dynamics;

B) Machine B: Utilizing the Difference of Carnot Efficiency (Reversible Thermodynamics) - Thermodynamics

1.2 A and B belong to different disciplines. There is a parallel relationship between them and there is no logical mutual inevitability.

1.3. Logic of the Second Law of Thermodynamics:

Experience induction, deny that A machine==> B machine can not be manufactured==> All material Kano efficiency: 1-T1/T2.

1.4 The logic of the second law of thermodynamics violates the physical logic that A and B cannot be inferred from each other.

1.5 The second law of thermodynamics elevates the "irreversibility", which is in fact only a kinetic experience.

📷 Detailed discussion can be found in the following figure.

Dariusz,

First you must identify exactly what you mean by "Global Warming".

Are you referring to so-called "man-made" global warming, or to the natural kind?

1. Temperature fluctuations in history – a brief analysis.

2. How can global warming change human behavior?

3. Global warming_urgency for a global solution.

1. The second law of thermodynamics loses the ability of quantitative prediction.

2. Data processing method of law 2 of thermodynamics violates scientific discipline: modifying experimental data to satisfy theory

See the picture for details.

3. The second law of thermodynamics can only be called science if it reaches the same quantitative prediction ability as Newton's second law, otherwise it is pseudoscience.

List all daily activities that created pollution in the air. Most of the above are not realized by people, they think they are "normal" activities.

However, when multiplied by thousands and millions of others they create a problem. This is what is happening, not too many people know the pollution they cause by their daily activities. Basically they act like "environment-destroyers" and they want to survive!

Global warming and the associated climate change can be analyzed statistically by examining the scientific data that are available.

A key aspect of climate change that is created through the burning of fossil fuels is the creation of markets for pricing and imposition of government taxes on carbon emissions.

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

How should the systems of nature protection and biodiversity of natural ecosystems be dispersed in order to increase the effectiveness of these systems and reduce the scale of degradation of the natural environment?

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

What do you think should be improved in nature conservation systems and biodiversity of natural ecosystems in addition to just increasing financial outlays on nature conservation policies conducted by government agencies and ministries of the environment?

A significant part of financial expenditures of nature conservation and biodiversity policy is devoted to the promotion of nature protection and natural environment protection issues. However, the effectiveness of this type of promotional campaigns is low, because without applying legal restrictions, enterprises do not change their technologies to be more ecological if they do not see in this business realized in a short time.

Even the occasional UN climate summits in which government representatives from the majority of countries take part do not cause significant real changes in the policy of nature protection and biodiversity?

Usually, the largest industrial economies in the world do not sign the obligations of rapid reduction of greenhouse gases and the issue of increasing spending on environmental innovation in the energy sector.

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

Why, despite the growing scale of public awareness, there is no significant improvement in the implementation of nature conservation and biodiversity policy, there are no real measures that would result in a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the slowing of the global warming process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Fear and shame. The two emotions manipulated by climate activists to advance their agenda. Meanwhile the real problem is shunned.

The reserach of climate change is higly politicized and used as a finacial and political tool. Therefore, research nowadays is far from objective. In order to focus on the worlds real problems science should go back to this what it should be: searching for facts and the truth regardless of finacial or political (or personal) interests (see my paper Climate Change - A review). I see physics as the leading science of climate research.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Due to the progressing global warming process, the problems of ecology, pollution and environmental protection, necessary pro-ecological reforms, transformation of the energy sector through the development of renewable energy sources, ecological innovations in waste management, recycling, etc. should acquire a global, international character and should be one of the most important factors of globalization in the 21st century.

What do you think about this topic?

What is your opinion on this topic?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion

main thrust on carbon foot print

@Dariusz: yes I see these needs too. We need to change our way of life and science has an important role to do this right. However, doing things right seems to be the problem. As said in my comment above, science is missused but also ingeneering. In Germany we have a big energy change towards renewable energy. But it is not working since renewable nergy requuires energy storage in fairly large scales. No solutions so far. We need investing in sustainable science and sustainable engineering but also educate people. The way to a sustainable society will be towfold: technolgy and behaviour.

As physics is universal, your hypothesis to quantify Earth's global mean surface temperature should also work on all planets. Mine in my paper "Planetary Core and Surface Temperatures" (published 2013) does so. So I ask ...

Given that there is no compelling evidence of the planet Uranus cooling off, can you explain how the necessary thermal energy gets to the base of the 350Km high nominal troposphere (altitude -300Km) in order to support temperatures estimated to be about 320K there, and can you quantify that empirical (extrapolated) measurement with a calculation based on your hypothesis? You may assume that the solar radiation maintains a temperature of about 60K which is found near the top of the Uranus atmosphere.

When you have considered this question, I will in due course write an article on Uranus explaining all this for the first time anywhere.

Dear Colleagues and Friends from RG,

I propose to add to this discussion considerations on the following important issue:

Forest ecosystems in Australia, the Amazon and many other forest ecosystems on planet Earth were largely completely destroyed in 2019 by massive fires.

The need to develop international cooperation under ecological policy.

For the purpose of conducting an analysis of the issue of the growing scale of forest fires in various places on the globe in 2019, I formulated the following thesis according to which international systems for managing ecological, climate, environmental risk etc. should be created and developed, and international cooperation should be developed in this issues. In order to verify the above research thesis, I suggest continuing the discussion on the issue of the growing scale of forest ecosystem fires and on the answer to the following question:

How to improve systems for forest ecosystem protection against subsequent fires?

Below are particularly important determinants of the growing scale of forest ecosystem fires. The conclusions of this discussion in key aspects of the discussed issues confirm the formulated research thesis. To the above discussion I would like to add the following conclusion formulated as a summary of my previous considerations on the topic: The need to develop international cooperation in the framework of ecological policy.

In Australia, over 500 million animals have already died in the current (beginning of January 2020) huge forest fires. Australia's forest ecosystems have been largely destroyed. It may take several hundred years to rebuild these ecosystems. The greenhouse gases and smoke produced by current fires over Australia already create a specific microclimate and local weather anomalies. The negative effects on natural ecosystems of current fires are therefore huge. In my opinion, the problem of huge forest fires in Australia and earlier also huge tropical forest fires in the Amazon, Siberian tundra forest fires and in many other places in 2019 should be considered natural disasters on a scale not only of individual countries but as natural, natural and climate disasters on global scale as an international and global problem. International ecological, climate, environmental, etc. risk management systems should be created and developed, and international cooperation in this matter should be developed.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In view of the above, the following questions are and will be valid for many years to come:

- How should Australian ecosystems be helped to rebuild them once these fires are over?

- How should systems improve the protection of forest ecosystems from subsequent fires?

- What ecological measures should be taken to effectively rebuild natural forest ecosystems in Australia as much as possible?

- How should international systems for managing ecological, climate, natural risk etc. be developed?

- How should international cooperation be developed to rebuild natural ecosystems damaged by fires?

- How should international environmental policy be developed?

- What do you think about this topic?

- What is your opinion on this topic?

Please reply.

I invite you to discussion.

Thank you very much.

Best wishes.

Dariusz Prokopowicz

I have made a world-first discovery in the field of atmospheric physics which finally completely and utterly refutes the claims (based on false physics) that carbon dioxide warms the Earth. It doesn't. It actually cools but by less than 0.1 degree. The main greenhouse gas water vapour definitely cools the surface by a few degrees. I have challenged David Karoly CEO at the CSIRO in Australia and filed FOI requests the responses to which PROVE that the CSIRO has failed to pay due diligence in checking the false physics of climatology. Read what this physicist said: http://whyitsnotco2.com/phsicist.jpg and watch my videos and read my papers or book linked at http://climate-change-theory.com.