From the electromagnetic perspective, it would appear that it is each charged particle of which the atoms making up the masses of the feather and of the ball that are individually subject to the constant acceleration in the gravitational gradient, which would explain why they all "fall" at the same rate.

Since they are charged and mutually induce more energy in each other the closer they get to the larger accumulation of charges towards which gradient they are accelerating, then their velocity in time can remain constant at c while they simply move faster and faster in space due their increasing momentum energy.

Analyzed in this article, with all historical formal articles and other references provided, including links to those that are directly available on the Internet.

Article Our Electromagnetic Universe (Expanded republication PI)

Like many others, Seyed kazem Mousavi is simply aware of time in a manner that Einstein rejected, which is that the NOW moment is the only moment during which all particles and masses in the universe simultaneously exist. The progression of this NOW moment is deemed to be at a constant velocity, which c happens to be the only constant velocity known in the universe.

Einstein did not accept that all particles and masses exist simultaneously in the universe.

This is why this concept does not exist in SR, but it does not mean that it does not exist in physical reality, only that Einstein did not agree with it. This concept is analyzed in the above referred paper, providing the formal references to other formal analyses of this version of the concept of time.

This could be interesting in connection with the graviatation and the time

Article The electromagnetic origin of gravity

Greetings and courtesy

Dear professors, thank you for your guidance, kindness, and attention

Dear Andreas Gimsa

Congratulation for your article on the electromagnetic origin of gravity. I completely agree.

You may be interested in actual mathematics that allow calculating gravity from the interaction between the elementary charges of which all atoms making up all masses in the universe are made.

Available in the last section of each of these two papers, the last section of the first one, titled Gravitation, being the introduction to the last section of the second paper, also titled Gravitation:

Article Introduction to Synchronized Kinematic and Electromagnetic Mechanics

Article Demystifying the Lorentz Force Equation

Best Regards, André

André Michaud

I'm glad you like my latest article. Thank you for pointing me to your articles, which I'm happy to look at.

What is the absolutely fundamental phenomenon/notion “Time” and its actualization in all/every informational patterns/systems, including the system “Matter” as the “time dimension” see SS posts in https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is-time-an-illusion/106, at least on pages 105 and 106.

What are the fundamental Nature Gravity and Electric forces see the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s 2007 initial model of these Forces in

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365437307_The_informational_model_-_Gravity_and_Electric_Forces , here only point:

- Gravity and Electric Forces are fundamentally different Forces, and so fundamentally by no means are linked by some way. So, say, that

“…From the electromagnetic perspective, it would appear that it is each charged particle of which the atoms making up the masses of the feather and of the ball that are individually subject to the constant acceleration in the gravitational gradient, which would explain why they all "fall" at the same rate.….”,

- etc., including in not only in the quoted passage’s post, but in a number of other posts also, really are some fundamentally unphysical claims.

That comment above relates to most of posts in the thread, and is sufficient. So a few notes to the discussion introduction:

“…A feather and a ball fall with constant acceleration in the gravitational field.

According to the arrow of time, do they fall in the gravitational field or move in the time dimensional?...”

- in the above the wording “arrow of time” is really superfluous; any/every change of state of any/everything, including a motion in space of, and/or changes of intrinsic processes rate in, any/every material object happens always in parallel as motion in positive direction of the time dimension, which [the direction] is so “time arrow”. Motion under some gravitational force doesn’t differ from other changes/motions principally specifically.

“…..it's humorously, but it seems that we are all moving at the speed of light in the dimension of time. When we move in space, the speed of our movement in the dimension of time decreases (time dilation)….”

As that is rigorously scientifically shown in the whole SS&VT Tokarevsky’s informational physical model

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354418793_The_Informational_Conception_and_the_Base_of_Physics, in this case it is enough to read two linked above papers,

Matter’s ultimate logical base is the [4+4+1]4D dense lattice of primary elementary logical structures – (at least) [4+4+1]4D binary reversible fundamental logical elements [FLE], which is placed in the correspondingMatter’s fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, (at least) [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct), where the 4+4 spacewith metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s) relates to the main degreases of freedom at changes of FLE state – “FLE binary flips”.

At that utmost universal “kinematical” spacetime has [5]4D metrics (cτ,X,Y,Z, ct), where just ct-dimension is true time dimensions, however because of the extremely mighty Galileo-Poincaré relativity principle action the motion in this dimension isn’t observable at physical practice till now, and so in mainstream physics really space cτ-dimension is used as the time dimension. At that indeed everything in Matter constantly moves in the 4D (cτ,X,Y,Z) space only with 4D velocities that have identical absolute values be equal to the speed of light, c.

That is determined by the FLE main parameters, i.e. FLE “size” and “FLE binary flip time” that are equal to Planck length and Planck time, c=lP/tP. The having rest mass particles, if are at absolute 3D space rest, move only along the cτ-axis, and at that intrinsic processes in particles [bodies, etc.] tick with maximal rate. If such particle moves also in 3 D space, the intrinsic processes are diluted by blank space steps, and so slow, however that by no means is some “time dilation”, both of “times” [and space also, though] are only “fixed” dimensions, i.e. fundamentally don’t flow to anywhere, and so cannot be “dilated”.

“….In the gravitational field, depending on the intensity of the gravitational field, the speed of our movement in time is less (Gravitational time dilation).….”

- as well as there cannot be fundamentally no “Gravitational time dilation”, though indeed, intrinsic processes in particles, bodies, etc., in Gravity fields are slowed – but in this case because of the energy conservation law and specificity of the Forces action, including, say, in electrically coupled systems of particles, bodies, etc., the internal processes are slowed as well, so really there exist “Electrical time dilation”, etc. – though remember that nowhere, including in these cases any “time dilations” fundamentally, cannot, and so don’t, exist.

More see the links above.

Cheers

Greetings and courtesy

dear professor

Thank you for your comprehensive explanation

Not only the gravitation is of electromagnetic origin, but also the strong force. The only conversion factor between the strong and the electromagnetic force is the substance-dependent permittivity.

Article The electromagnetic origin of gravity

Article The Unification of the Fundamental Interactions

Theories start by postulating assumptions. Then test how the postulates agree with observations. So, set-up any weirdness you wish, does it work? We already know both GR and QM have many holes. Being more complex only makes the understanding harder. So, go simpler - say 1 force that becomes all 4. If that 1 is magnetic that is attached to particles, then it automatically eliminated the strong and weak postulates. moving magnet implies charge -another unneeded force. So, gravity is magnetic - now there is a simplification in postulates - how? Now add time as humans have experienced it since birth (it is only NOW as André Michaud suggests- now that would be a better model.

Peace be upon YOU

Dear Professor, Andreas Gimsa

I agree

Greetings and courtesy

Dear professor, André Michaud

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your love and attention.

With respect and courtesy

Dear Professor John Hodge

When we view events in higher dimensions from the perspective of intrinsic geometry.

This becomes very complicated.

Like the phenomena of quantum mechanics

Imagine, our world is two-dimensional and we all live on the surface of an expanding sphere.

The fourth and third dimensions are both imaganery dimensions. From our point of view, they are in one dimension.

The gravitational field is like a hole on the surface of the sphere.

and our spin-dependent electromagnetic field in expanding space.

The article

The General Balance In The Six Dimensional Of Space-Time

The thread topic “Time and Gravity” is rigorously scientifically enough clarified in the SS post on page 1, i.e. it is scientifically explained – what is “Time” and what is “Gravity”, including, say, that Gravity is fundamentally nothing else than some fundamental Nature force – as that also Electric, Strong/Nuclear, and rather possibly Weak, Forces are.

All fundamental Forces are fundamentally different, and so, say, there fundamentally cannot be Gravity “From the electromagnetic perspective” , “electromagnetic origin of gravity”, and, of course, something as “1 force that becomes all 4”, etc..

However Matter is rather simple logical structure, and so absolutely everything in Matter is/are specific disturbances in the Matter’s fundamental, universal, and ultimate base– the (at least) [4+4+1]4D dense lattice of primary elementary logical structures – (at least) [4+4+1]4D binary reversible fundamental logical elements [FLE], the lattice is placed in the corresponding Matter’s fundamentally absolute, fundamentally flat, and fundamentally “Cartesian”, (at least) [4+4+1]4D spacetime with metrics (at least) (cτ,X,Y,Z, g,w,e,s,ct);

- while, as that is rigorously scientifically shown in the Shevchenko-Tokarevsky’s 2007 initial model of Gravity and Electric forces

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365437307_The_informational_model_-_Gravity_and_Electric_Forces

- and 2023 initial model of Nuclear [that binds nucleons in nuclei] Force https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369357747_The_informational_model_-Nuclear_Force ,

- all these Forces [and it looks as quite rational to assume that Strong force that compose hadrons also] act by the same one scheme – i.e. act in 3D space, the Forces mediators fundamentally at least at statics don’t contain/carry energy, while all Forces mediators are some “rims” in the lattice, which are radiated by fundamentally different Forces charges, propagate in the lattice with the speed of light, and cause/trigger releasing of elementary momentums p=±ћ/r, r is distance between “radiating” and “irradiated” particles, which attract/relapse these particles. The difference of Forces’ strengths is determined only by intensity of radiating rims.

Nonetheless despite these common points in Forces, the Forces, again, are fundamentally different, including, first of all, are different functionally; just so everything in Matter is as it is.

Cheers

I am very glad and it is an important irrefutable natural phenomenon that one can trace back the fundamental forces including gravity to an electromagnetic origin. It is important here that from the theore calculable results come out, which agree with the observations. That is the only standard, not any assumptions or assertions in obscure publications.

Article The electromagnetic origin of gravity

dear professors

A theory is sometimes derived from assumptions or mathematical equations.

Sometimes from experimental tests.

If the electromagnetic field creates a gravitational field under certain conditions.

You can look at this differently.

I will eagerly be reading the comments of loved ones.

Maybe the origin of the experiments I have done is a force other than gravity.

I sincerely thank all the dear professors.

Andreas Gimsa , Seyed kazem Mousavi

What are the links to experiments where your model explains the observation and other models do not?

My model (STOE) includes a most fundamental body component that is a magnet with N and S poles. This was shown by experiments deriving from André Michaud research wherein the force of repulsion of N poles and of S poles was measured - an asymmetry was found. If bodies are assemblies of magnets, the strong and weak forces are merely ad hoc additions to models that suggest bodies carry charge (hence protons repel). The problem the STOE may have is the cohesion of electrons around protons. Electrons rotating around protons held by an electric force has a major, longstanding and unsolved problem, they should but don't radiate. The STOE model suggests electrons (magnets) are held by photons (a column of magnets) to protons (magnets). Thus giving the experimental observation that other models fail to explain. (This is all in several papers.)

I noticed in papers that just ``mass'' is used. But there are 3 things bodies must do (from Newton) - exert a gravitational field (gravitational mass), respond to the gravitational field (weight from gradient of field), and inhibit changes (inertia).

John Hodge

"What are the links to experiments where your model explains the observation and other models do not?"

My electromagnetic explanation of gravity leads to Newton in the end. There are countless confirmations of this. Also, I base it on the expanion of the universe, this is also observed. Also the inertia of the masses can be explained very well with the electromagnetic displacement currents which occur with the object enlargement.

Article The electromagnetic cause of gravity

There is a radiation, which should be valid for all accelerated masses after Maxwell, thus also for electrons and protons. This radiation is time. With the expansion of the universe it arises, and by the gravitation it is erased. This is the observed time dilation. It is a one-dimensional radiation mechanism (see derivation of the one-dimensional Stefan-Boltzmann law). During the expansion of the universe magnetic dipoles decay, during gravitation they are created. This is not so far from your considerations. Also the effect of time dilation leads again perfectly to Newton's law.

Article The cause of gravity

Andreas Gimsa

I had scanned the electromagnetic paper. I've downloaded the `The cause of gravity' paper for a more careful study.

However, I note the expansion of the universe is based on the ASSUMPTION that galaxy redshift is due to the Doppler redshift. The data has a very poor correlation (indeed the data from galaxies outside our cluster has a 0.3 - reject - correlation) and this model fails to explain the periodic redshift observation. I suggest the recent JWST observation are also questioning this assumption.

I note you seem to rely on relativity. There are many observations that reject relativity.

So, I'm interested is learning of an observation that supports your model and not Newton or relativity. If there is none, then why not just accept the better known models ?

John Hodge

For the correct description of the redshift, which agrees with the observations, I would like to refer to my following publication:

Article The great fallacy of the accelerated expansion of the universe

What makes you think that I rely on the theories of relativity?

All my calculations show that they must be wrong. For the special relativity theory is valid: What Einstein claims is mathematically impossible, that two observers, which are each on an inertial system and the one system is moved against the other, always the time of the other passes more slowly.

The statement is in a way half correct: Only for the observer who is on an inertial system which was accelerated before and to which consequently energy was supplied, the time passes more slowly in relation to its previous state in rest. So there is the time dilation, only not in the form as Einstein describes it.

The general relativity theory is already wrong because the Einstein constant cannot be constant. Besides, the theory assumes a smooth space-time. From the quantum physics it is known that with smaller space distances the vacuum fluctuations become larger and larger. The smooth space-time is completely destroyed here. Therefore, the general relativity theory cannot be united with the quantum physics...

All my calculations show that Newton's equations are correct. There is now also the electromagnetic explanation of the gravity cause from the Maxwell equations and further interpretations in connection with the time dilation and the expansion of the universe.

Article The electromagnetic cause of gravity