Doesn't my preprint "Time dilation as an intrinsic property of light explaining the constancy of the speed of light regardless of the measurement frame" provide the right answer? Einstein predicted nothing of the sort; is opposing it tantamount to opposing Einstein, as many, if not most, reviewers believe? Moreover, didn't the one who wanted the ratio between h and reduced h to be equal to two Pi and not LAMDA, for example, turn physics into a chapter of mathematics? Isn't this the greatest loss for physics? Does physics have the right to exist as pure physics to finally arrive at the absolute values of constants and adopt quantum gravity and bind the infinitely small and the infinitely large under a single theory?