Dear Alimjan Abla,

I answer about Kant.

Question: "Why Kant can’t write?"

Answer: “ Kant wrote the philosophical works, sitting at a desk and looked out of the window on a spike of Lutheran church. But then the poplar before Kant's window has grown and has closed a spike of Lutheran church. Therefore Kant couldn't write the philosophical works any more. But Kant was very clever therefore he has called the servant to whom he has ordered to cut a poplar. After that when the poplar has been cut, Kant has continued to write the philosophical works.” It is the known historic fact.

Alexander

Dear Alimjan Abla,

I answer about Kant.

Question: "Why Kant can’t write?"

Answer: “ Kant wrote the philosophical works, sitting at a desk and looked out of the window on a spike of Lutheran church. But then the poplar before Kant's window has grown and has closed a spike of Lutheran church. Therefore Kant couldn't write the philosophical works any more. But Kant was very clever therefore he has called the servant to whom he has ordered to cut a poplar. After that when the poplar has been cut, Kant has continued to write the philosophical works.” It is the known historic fact.

Alexander

Dear Alexander,

I found excellent the historical fact about spike, poplar and Kant. I did not know that. So rational!

Kant was forced to stop writing just because of the view. Excellent his idea to cut the poplar. Of course, if we are sitting in front of a window and a poplar blocks the view of the spike of the Lutheran church – which instruments his thinking - the way is to cut the poplar.

As you correctly said this is a historical fact.  This momentum is an excellent example of spatio-temporal objects ordering causal behavior and logical properties.

Dear Vassiliss Duucas,

You are from France. You liked one my question of the chief German philosopher Kant. Then I will ask you two questions of the chief German poet Goethe.

It is historically known that Goethe in the carriage together with the Austrian army went to suppress Great French revolution.

First question: "What German philosopher Goethe took in the carriage as the fellow traveler?".

Second question: "What did Goethe tell when saw consequences of Great French revolution?"

Sincerely, Alexander

Goethe told Eckermann that "what makes Germany great is her admirable popular culture, which has penetrated all parts of the Empire evenly. And is it not the many different princely residences from whence this culture springs and which are its bearers and curators? Just assume that for centuries only the two capitals of Vienna and Berlin had existed in Germany or even only a single one. Then I wonder what would have happened to the German culture and the widespread prosperity that goes hand in hand with culture."

"Think about cities such as Dresden, Munich, Stuttgart, Kassel, Braunschweig, Hanover, and similar ones; think about the energy that these cities represent; think about the effect they have on neighboring provinces, and ask yourself, if all of this would exist if such cities had not been the residences of princes for a long time."

"Frankfurt, Bremen, Hamburg, Luebeck are large and brilliant, and their impact on the prosperity of Germany is incalculable. Yet, would they remain what they are if they were to lose their independence and be incorporated as provincial cities into one great German Empire? I have reason to doubt this."

 "Legislators and revolutionaries who promise equality and liberty at the same time," he wrote in his Maximen und Reflexionen, "are either psychopaths or mountebanks." Political centralization, as Goethe explained in his conversation with Eckermann, would lead to the destruction of culture.

The psychopaths have won.

 Dear Louis Brassard,

Very many thanks for participation in discussion. I too like to read Eckermann.

But I asked two specific questions on other subject and I give on them two concrete answers. 

First question: "What German philosopher Goethe took in the carriage as the fellow traveler?".

Answer: "Goethe invited in fellow travelers of the young beginning philosopher G. F. Hegel.

Second question: "What did Goethe tell when saw consequences of Great French revolution?"

Goethe told: "Revolution can be pressed, but it is impossible to crush".

Sincerely, Alexander

There is this real story. When Kant passed away his head (head, not brain) was studied carefully and it was discovered that the top of his head had a sort of sinking. The rumor runs that he ended up truly exhausted at the end of his life.

Dear Carlos Eduardo Maldonado I as the inhabitant of the biological center of Russia of the city of Pushchino, has learned from scientific biologists that any person, for example, you either Emmanuil Kant or a hare who sometimes comes to my country house consists, generally from two parts. No 1) the Head and a skull, is a firm part of the person or a hare, No 2) the Stomach and buttocks, are a soft part of the person or a hare. When the person grows thin, decreases in volume of No 2), and the skull and the head [No 1)] remains the same volume. I don't understand how at Kant everything happened on the contrary?

Sincerely, Alexander

Dear Marković G. Đokore please rememberonce and for all that all that I tell about Kant, Hegel or Bismank is also the historical ultimate truth and isn't subject to discussion. So I was taught by my ancestors of Edelgauza, descendants of the Teftonsky award. Another matter my new publications about geometry of the quantum theory. On this matter I am completely ready for discussions.

Sincerely, Alexander

The notion of axiom – Greek origin and Greek word (ἀξίωμα)  -  provides the basis of scientific and social progress. 

An axiom or postulate is a statement that is taken to be true, to serve as a premise or starting point for further reasoning and arguments.  “It is an historical ultimate truth and isn't subject to discussion, that after the poplar has been cut, Kant has continued to write the philosophical works”.  This is a postulate.  It’s not only the obstacle that counts – the poplar - but also how Kant or he/she overcome it. 

People wonder about a statement that they cannot perceive. Truth has not always a pragmatic meaning or a value. An axiom is the basis of progress and evolution providing source of inspiration without need to be subject to evaluation.